|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 17th, 2008, 11:19 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 456
|
Great, so you've identified that your issues aren't due to basic encoding but are instead attributable to your specialized video application. You have intensive video with numerous simultaneous changes in non-adjacent regions of the screen - hardly the type of thing optimized by encoding algorithms.
This is a whole different story than the way your posting started out. And like the rest of us, you'll need to play with the setting and the characteristics of YouTube. Further, you'll learn in the future to carefully consider your camerawork and editing to help mitigate problems downstream. And in so doing, you too will become a master of the dark arts and having others wondering why they can't seem easily emulate your results. Have fun, Michael |
January 18th, 2008, 12:00 AM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
Because my material is so short, I want a better initial encoding to handle all of the activity that is going on.
__________________
https://alexlogic.blogspot.com/ Los Angeles Emmy Winner (yes, used a video edit controller and loved doing so.) |
|
| ||||||
|
|