|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 18th, 2007, 11:18 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san miguel allende , gto , mexico
Posts: 644
|
Is this what we've been waiting for ??
|
February 18th, 2007, 01:36 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 59
|
yes!
maybe? |
February 18th, 2007, 02:58 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rego Park, NY
Posts: 20
|
is for me
but I'll use the HV10 Canon while waiting for the Sony to be available
|
February 18th, 2007, 05:22 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Am I reading it right... bigger than a 1/2 inch chip, right ?
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
February 18th, 2007, 05:59 PM | #5 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Quote:
http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=85486 |
|
February 19th, 2007, 12:59 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
Um isn't the Red camera and Silicon Imaging camera already using a large CMOS chip that clocks at 60fps? The Red chip is the size of 35mm has 4K resolution and can do up to 60fps. At 2k or HD resolution it can do 120fps. I would not consider this SONY chip a huge shocker because this has already been done and is already being used in camera designs. The Silicon Imaging camera is pretty much finished and is being used for a few film projects. The SI camera has a 2/3" chip at up to 2K resolution and can do 72fps at 720p.
Plus the Chip in the Canon HV10 camera is actually a progressive chip that is clocked at 60p. The DSP then creates 60i out of that 60p. So Canon already has a 1920x1080 60p CMOS chip that is slightly larger then 1/3". The only thing this SONY has above the Canon chip is that it is a little bit larger with a litle bit more resolution that wouldn't really help for HD recording anyway. I think this chip is designed more to target the highend film community who might be thinking of a Red or SI camera. This may be the new direction of the Cinealta line. |
February 19th, 2007, 01:22 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Yep, I'm thinking this chip is going to find its way to the more high-end Sony gear. Most likely a successor to the F900 series or something along those lines. There's also a good bet that this is typical Sony pre-NAB FUD in an attempt to steal some of the thunder away from RED, SI and others who are undoubtedly putting a dent in their CineAlta sales.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
February 19th, 2007, 03:20 AM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/c.../imx017cqe.pdf the title is: "high resolution cmos sensor for CONSUMER products..." this is a 180nm process. not fancy at all: 1 poly, 3 metal... 54mhz clock. the die is big enough that it's not going to be ultra cheap. you could probably guess the manufacturing cost is on the order of $100 (and not $1000). the data is easily enough pumped into memory where a teeny and cheap microprocessor encodes it on the fly using one of the many good "visually lossless" codecs... for pro applications. or to an h.264 codec at 25mpbs for prosumer apps and onto miniDV tape. why should the latter cost more than the $3k cameras we have now? only very recently it cost >$10k for the kind of still camera resolution we're getting for <$500 now. the same thing has always been on the verge of happening with video cameras. looks like it's begun this year. |
|
| ||||||
|
|