|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 28th, 2006, 12:07 AM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
October 28th, 2006, 01:53 AM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 532
|
Quote:
Here's an analogy: imagine you used to drive 14miles at 40mph to the store. Now a new store opened up 7 miles away from you and you just need to drive 40mph to get to it. AND laws have changed and you can now drive at 70mph to the store 14miles away. Which is the fastest route? Now remember I'm in canada so if that miles and mph stuff is off don't blame me but that should give you the general idea of how it all works. :) |
|
October 30th, 2006, 02:41 PM | #18 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
One day I'll get around to testing AIC ingest on my G-RAID. * IIRC, the FW400 and FW800 ports are on the same bus - if a FW400 device is connected, the FW800 port becomes throttled to the same speed. Apple did not advocate having camcorder and capture disk on the same FW bus for some time (I think it was acknowledged from 4.5 onwards). The canonical way was to use a FW PCMCIA card for ingest, and the FW800 port for capture scratch. OTOH, I see there's an eSATA card for the MacBook Pros allowing a cheap SATA 250GB drive (for less than an an equivalent LaCie triple) get upto 5x the performance of a FW800 drive. |
|
October 31st, 2006, 06:25 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centreville, Maryland
Posts: 258
|
I still going to wait for leopard to be finalized before I seriously think about a new machine.
|
October 31st, 2006, 09:45 AM | #20 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
The FW 400 PC card could be used for your camcorder and that would free up the builtin FW 800 port for your disk. |
|
November 2nd, 2006, 11:45 PM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
The next MacBook Pro should have a hard drive like this.
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...2050534,00.asp |
November 4th, 2006, 10:49 AM | #22 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
November 5th, 2006, 05:35 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
17" Mac BookPro to arrive ...
on Nov. 14. I should have it up and running soon after it arrives. Lots of software to buy (ugghhh).
|
| ||||||
|
|