|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 11th, 2006, 11:20 PM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
One other thing to consider here is that Joe Average Consumer doesn't even know there is a format war. There's a good bet that the format war will be over or negated through universal players long before it becomes an issue to the general consumer. DVD players did not see mass acceptance and finally gain dominance over VCRs until they fell below the $150 price point and I don't see HD-DVD or BluRay players doing any differently. Seriously, if Sony can stave off the licensing for universal players long enough to introduce BluRay players under $200 and be able to do it before Toshiba can get HD-DVD players to that price point, then BluRay will win. Likewise, if Toshiba can clean up the bugs and get 1080p output going and get the price point down to $200 first, HD-DVD will probably win... And either one will have to be able to meet consumer demand while doing this too.
In this war, Sony is the lumbering giant and there's no secret about what they're going to do. The ball is truly in Toshiba's court and every time they've had a true scoring opportunity, they've dropped it. OTOH, we're all going to get to know BluRay very well regardless of which format wins the HD video disc stanard war. BluRay is the superior format for lots of other types of media, including computer data formats and upcoming software/multimedia/data distribution. It's offering promises that HD-DVD can't even begin to touch and Sony is already shipping the first generation BD rewritable drives to system integrators and we can expect to see them in systems from Dell, Apple, HP and Sony's own Vaio lines within the next 30 to 60 days.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
July 12th, 2006, 08:13 AM | #32 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
My gut instinct right now is that HD players and discs aren't going to catch on very quickly with most consumers. I wish it were otherwise, but pricing and the format war make it a product most people will probably avoid for now. |
|
July 12th, 2006, 08:49 AM | #33 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
__________________
Martin at HeadSpin HD on Blu-ray |
|
July 12th, 2006, 01:29 PM | #34 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Sony is hoping the PS3 sells well enough to support widespread Blue Ray adoption. Why buy an expensive player now when you can get that and more for 599.00 in a few months. We won't see much movement till next year on all of this anyway. I'll set back and let the early adopters have their fun.
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
July 12th, 2006, 04:35 PM | #35 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
July 12th, 2006, 11:44 PM | #36 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
|
July 13th, 2006, 09:51 AM | #37 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Audio output from the PS3 will be via Optical and analag stereo pair. The HDMI module will allow for HDMI 8 channel audio as well, in the form of PCM and Dolby Digital. Audio output from the BDP-S1 will have discrete linear PCM from the HDMI, standard PCM, DD and DTS. There are also individual audio connectors for each of the 8 audio channels in addition to optical, coaxial and stereo connectors. The PS3's BluRay playback is software based... How that translates into what we get remains to be seen. Could be very good, could be second best or it could just plain suck. I've had Sony reps tell me that the playback quality is not as good as the BDP-S1 and the playback software has limited color processing abilities and is not as adept at some of the deinterlacing and motion functions. They also dodged the question about direct 24p output, but I think it's because they didn't know the answer. Some indications point to the PS3 not supporting 1080p or 720p output at 24fps, but rather only at 60Hz. So for those with newer 72 and 120 Hz displays with native 1080p24 input, the PS3 won't be able to accommodate and the TV will have to attempt to properly remove the duplicate frames to eliminate motion judder. First and foremost, the PS3 is a game system. The fact that it plays BD Video is an added feature/bonus as are several of the other media-centric features. I've had two different individuals from Sony on two separate occasions compare the BD Video playback of the PS3 to DVD playback on the PS2 vs. their other stand-alone DVD players of the time. In other words, it's going to be the "cheap" solution. ...But I'm still willing to bet that PS3 BD Video output is still better than what you'd get from that new Samsung BDV-P1000 turd.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
July 13th, 2006, 10:24 AM | #38 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 219
|
Toshiba to delay HD-DVD recorder
The release date for the RD-A1 will be pushed back from July 14 to the 27th.
The HD-DVD burner which is capable of recording 130 hours of HD broadcast content on it's one terabyte hardrive system will be the first available HD-DVD burner priced around 398,000 yen and expects to sell 10,000 units by the end of 2006. When the burners will be released overseas in unclear. As to Blue-ray burners, I've heard they've been available since 2003. |
July 13th, 2006, 09:35 PM | #39 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
July 13th, 2006, 10:21 PM | #40 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 219
|
Jeff,
Actually, Fry's was selling Sony Vaio desktops with bluray burners. I posted a message on a different thread here. |
July 14th, 2006, 12:52 AM | #41 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Public statements they've maid at EC3 have contradicted that. Their belief in the abilty of the Cell chips they jointly developed with IBM indicate they feel the PS3 can process HD video in excellent quality, including 7.1 surround.. without compromises. They view the PS3 as much more than a game system. Maybe with the issues that have come up with trying to develop HD games for the PS3 have toned down the rhetoric. Interesting info from Sony, only time will tell what they actually deliver.
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
|
July 15th, 2006, 12:23 AM | #42 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
July 15th, 2006, 12:50 AM | #43 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
As for BD video playback, the Cell chips and graphics capabilities are well beyond what is needed. The PS3 does have 7.1 audio output, just not the discrete connections for those who want them, nor discrete linear PCM over HDMI. If you want 7.1 connectivity, you will have to use the optical audio connection or HDMI. Perhaps I'm in the minority, but for a player that's to be my main HD movie player, I would want to run discrete audio connections from each of the 8 connectors right into the 7.1 inputs of my AV receiver. Much more functionality and control that way. Where the PS3 will falter for BD playback is the software player. And like I've said, I've had more than one Sony rep tell me the same thing on different occasions, so they're either being coached as to what to say or they're speaking the truth. The only reason I can think for them to downplay the PS3's BD capabilities is so that people don't pass on the BDP-S1. OTOH, if what they say is correct, then the potential silver lining is that a software player can be upgraded and there's a good bet that they will since the PS3's own software is supposed to be upgradable. So I guess we'll see what happens when the system arrives... Personally, I probably won't buy a PS3 as I don't have time to play many games anymore and my XBOX 360 is perfectly fine. I did buy the Samsung BD player on an impulse and returned it because, well, it sucked and I thought it was unacceptable for the price. I doubt I'd buy a Sony BDP-S1 as I can probably fight the impulse now. I think I'll wait a while and see what happens. I'm not real pleased with my Toshiba HD-A1 either. It's a complete POS. Decent HD image quality, but the 1080i output limitation is somewhat disappointing after Toshiba was initially supposed to have 1080p capability. Upconverted DVD quality (that so many people rave over on this player for some reason) is no better than my $250 Sony CX995V DVD changer with HDMI. But it is better than the Samsung upconverting players or that Oppo 1080p piece of crap.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
July 17th, 2006, 10:15 AM | #44 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
I was basing my statements on the E3 DVDs I purchased at GameSpot which had the full Sony presentation at the event. I always take promotional stuff with a grain of salt. But it was a lot of senior execs from both Sony and Nividia talking it up. Going to be a lot of egg on the face if they can't deliver.
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
July 17th, 2006, 12:21 PM | #45 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
...Nintendo used to be just as bad, but they cleaned up their act with the gamecube and all their releases following. But I think the whole claim of "real time radiosity/GI rendering" for the N64 was a bit much. I'm not really involved anymore, but I used to work in the games industry. Done my share of development work. I worked on the Dreamcast, PS2 Atari Jaguar, PSX and Sega Saturn. Nobody hypes a system and makes false claims the way Sony does. ;-) And they have enough fanboys and market presence to make the sales happen regardless. And when it all comes down to it, even though it may not come close to the claims, PS3 will still be the most powerful system out there come launch day. Even if it lacks raw CPU power vs. the XBOX360 (which there is tangible evidence showing that it will), the new nVidia chip is killer and the PS3 will have a serious edge for graphics vs the 360. And like the original XBOX, there will be about a few months before we see a superior nVidia chip hit desktop computer systems.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
| ||||||
|
|