|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 5th, 2013, 08:24 PM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
Re: What cameras did the Sundance entries use?
Quote:
-- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
|
February 6th, 2013, 04:50 AM | #17 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,596
|
Re: What cameras did the Sundance entries use?
|
February 6th, 2013, 11:36 AM | #18 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
Re: What cameras did the Sundance entries use?
Quote:
Yes, talent IS important. Writing, directing, cinematography and editing. But frankly, in MY not-so-humble opinion, if your story is strong enough, you are showing contempt for your viewer by not using the best AVAILABLE tools to tell it. I've seen some interesting documentaries that had great content but something as simple as the audio or framing being TERRIBLE has thrown the entire viewing experience off for me. Not bothering to involve the right people to make decisions around quality that you are unable to make is arrogant and short-sighted. The BEST films are the ones made by a group of talented and totally "bought-in" people who are passionate about the story or the message. Does everything need to be shot in 4k on an Epic? No, but deliberately shooting on an iPhone with the built in mic shows contempt for the viewer or laziness on the part of the "director". Trade sweat equity with other film makers - you shoot mine, I'll edit yours. Whatever it takes. The whole concept of the high quality "zero-budget" or "micro-budget" film is absolutely flawed. There WAS a budget - contra or sweat equity. In Vancouver, LOTS of films are made without paying for crew. The best of them are when groups of people get together on their days off to systematically work through the collective's "to shoot" list. Again, I help you today, you help me next week. COMPLETELY acceptable - it's called contra. A reciprocal agreement. The Craigslist phenomena of Friday night crew calls for DoPs WITH CAMERA and sound techs for noon Saturday crew call is absolutely flawed. Good people, good story, good planning. And don't forget EXCELLENT promotion. Facebook is only ONE TINY STEP in your marketing plan... <steps off soapbox>
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ Last edited by Shaun Roemich; February 6th, 2013 at 02:50 PM. Reason: errant comma |
|
February 26th, 2013, 09:20 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London UK
Posts: 430
|
Re: What cameras did the Sundance entries use?
Well it's a nice idea Shaun, but in my experience there are a lot of "something for nothing" merchants out there. I remember editing a short for a guy and putting serious hours in. It didn't occur to him to capture the 13 hours of footage on his own FCP system before handing it over to me. After a couple of weeks of him dropping by my place i had to tell him to go and buy some effing coffee and biscuits. That was his sole contribution to my weeks of work. About 2 pound fifty.
After that i shot and edited a music video for a guy and he later asked me if i wanted to BUY a 10 quid bag of weed off him. I nearly fell off my bar stool! Those days are gone, and i'd have to absolutely love the person and their project to get involved these days, but it's still a good point. There are people collaborating and doing great things, but you need to be careful who you're getting involved with. Regarding gear, there's no doubt - and many examples- of low gear budget going a long way. And vice versa. |
February 26th, 2013, 09:48 AM | #20 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,596
|
Re: What cameras did the Sundance entries use?
So Dom...did you buy the bag of weed?
|
| ||||||
|
|