|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 7th, 2012, 10:37 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pembroke Pines FL
Posts: 331
|
Canon T4I
Canon touts EOS Rebel T4i with improved video focusing system, EF-S 18-135mm and EF 40mm silent lenses (hands-on) -- Engadget
Now we need to wait to the 70D or 7D MAMRK 2
__________________
www.nostalgicFrames.com |
June 8th, 2012, 10:50 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Re: Canon T4I
No word on anti-aliasing. Fingers crossed...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
June 8th, 2012, 03:48 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Re: Canon T4I
I also wonder about the noise reduction - that seems to be the key to the 5DmkIII's high-iso performance, but I wouldn't be surprised if they limited it to differentiate the video performance between the two.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
June 8th, 2012, 04:34 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Re: Canon T4I
IMO, the 5D3 is cleaner in video mode partly because it handles colors better. When you look at a hard, curved edge on the 5D2, you get false colors sprinkled around the edge. That results in colors that have to be encoded into a half bandwidth (in both dimensions) space with larger macro blocks and less bandwidth. By cleaning up the way the sensor is read - and probably by reading more photosites - the camera is able to eliminate a bunch of color garbage before it ever gets to the next level.
FWIW, I've done some B&W tests on the 5D2 using glass, colored filters and the Monochrome picture style, and it's extremely clean - even at very high ISOs. Since my colored filters lose up to 2-2/3 stops, that extra ISO performance comes in handy! The 5D2's luma noise is fine and fairly attractive as well. It's really the chroma noise that keeps us from cranking the ISO past 1250 or so.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
June 8th, 2012, 07:23 PM | #5 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
Re: Canon T4I
Quote:
Richard |
|
June 8th, 2012, 08:29 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Re: Canon T4I
This makes the recently released 24/2.8 IS and 28/2.8 IS lenses even weirder. It might make sense to give up a faster speed on a prime with both IS and the new video AF feature. That they were released just before the new STM lenses were introduced really makes me wonder for whom these lenses were made. Apparently not for T4i video shooters.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
June 9th, 2012, 01:58 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 321
|
Re: Canon T4I
No mention of the 3x video zoom like the 600d - real shame.
Also no mention of improved moire or alaising. |
June 9th, 2012, 04:09 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Re: Canon T4I
Quote:
I found this t4i low light sample though and it doesn't look appreciably better than the mkII, so I suspect it doesn't have the same kind of noise processing as the mkIII:
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
|
June 9th, 2012, 06:36 PM | #9 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Canon T4I
|
June 10th, 2012, 11:30 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Re: Canon T4I
DP Review has a pretty detailed rundown of the camera including close-ups of all the connection options - there's no mention of a headphone jack and none is visible in any of the photos, so I think it's safe to assume there isn't one.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
| ||||||
|
|