|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 6th, 2010, 12:49 PM | #31 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Just export to H.264 and no lower than a bit rate of 8. Obviously the more the better.
|
March 8th, 2010, 08:46 AM | #32 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
I've done some demos of this technique and others have already started implementing it in the wild. Users of modern browsers get their open standards and better performance, users of IE still get their video via flash, and everybody's happy! It's far from perfect, but it's progress. Internet Explorer will continue to hold things back, but that's all the more reason why anyone who can switch to a standards-compliant browser (Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome, etc.) should do so and start using HTML5 video wherever it is offered. Don't give up hope! Let your voice be heard! Vote with your mouse! OK, stepping off soapbox now... |
|
March 10th, 2010, 06:23 AM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Except the web developer who now needs to produce two versions of each video file & muck about with extra coding rather than just embedding a simple Flash player:-)
|
March 10th, 2010, 06:28 PM | #34 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
|
Touché. : )
|
April 16th, 2010, 02:05 PM | #35 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: York, England
Posts: 1,323
|
I used to really like Vimeo for hosting video, but it's go so slow recently that most of my customers are complaining about the load times - 1080p can only make it worse.
__________________
Qualified UAV Pilot with CAA PFAW Aerial Photo / Aerial Video | Corporate Video Production |
April 16th, 2010, 02:19 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
I always found vimeo to be much more stable when it comes to load times. Youtube is so hit and miss.
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
April 20th, 2010, 02:11 AM | #37 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 133
|
I use 8bit highest quality H.264 in my 720p (25frame PAL) coded with Procoder 3 and send it too Vimeo. I have paid for my account so I get 2 passes of encoding instead of one when you have a free account.
Filmed with Panasonic HPX171 and HPX301 edit with Cineform Prospect HD and Premiere Pro CS3. (This is in Swedish thought) |
April 20th, 2010, 05:42 PM | #38 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
You might be using one I can't really tell but for outdoor scenes like that a B+W 502 gray graduated ND filter works wonders. It reduces exposure 2 stops at the upper half of the scene bringing out detail on the lower half. B+W 502 Graduated ND filter I leave mine on all the time outdoors. Cheers.
__________________
Drink more tap water. On admission at Sydney hospitals more than 5% of day patients are de-hydrated. |
|
April 22nd, 2010, 03:40 PM | #39 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 133
|
Thanks Allan
I know Swedish is hard to understand some times (ha ha ha) I think this will come in English soon (I hope) so you fellows could understand the spoken words. It's sooooo beautiful place, you should try to go there some day!!! The music is played and written by me thought. I don't use the B+W 502 gray graduated ND filter but I will for sure buy one, it's a sweet product. The picture on the "potato", "children who throw snow", "waitress who related to herring in jars" and the "family outside in the snow" is shot with HPX301 in AVC-Intra 100 in 25fps in 720p and this make such a difference. The rest is shot in DVCPRO HD 1440 scaled down with Cineform Prospect HD to 720p. Best Regards Mikael Six String Studio |
May 5th, 2010, 11:35 PM | #40 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 25
|
IE9 will support HTML5
Microsoft general manager for Internet Explorer Dean Hachamovitch noted this his company is throwing its weight behind the H.264 standard promoted by Apple for future HTML5 video content:
The future of the web is HTML5. Microsoft is deeply engaged in the HTML5 process with the W3C. HTML5 will be very important in advancing rich, interactive web applications and site design. The HTML5 specification describes video support without specifying a particular video format. We think H.264 is an excellent format. In its HTML5 support, IE9 will support playback of H.264 video only. This is taken from http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/201...ml5-video.aspx |
May 10th, 2010, 07:37 AM | #41 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 356
|
I have 2 clips that are about 3gig but I want to get them under 1 gig, what setting in Compressor would you recommend that would be BEST for Vimeo? Both Clips are 720.
Thanks |
May 13th, 2010, 11:53 PM | #42 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 278
|
Nigel,
Thanks for mentioning SmugMug. I have had several complaints from music video clients who don't understand that dropped frames from vimeo is not my fault; but have just done a test run with SmugMug and playback is perfect, so I think they'll be getting my money. Cheers, Vaughan |
May 15th, 2010, 03:14 AM | #43 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Vaughan,
I am glad that you are happy with my recommendation. I think the difference between the two services is that SmugMug was set up as a commercial service for professional photographers to display & sell their products & moving into video is a logical extension of that service for their customers. Vimeo is basically a social networking site that charges to host your videos. In any case as I read Vimeo's T&Cs commercial use is forbidden but this seems to be widely ignored & even tacitly allowed. |
| ||||||
|
|