|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 25th, 2008, 09:11 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 66
|
Stage6.com shutting down...
Did see any posts here...
http://www.stage6.com I liked it over Vimeo, since what you uploaded was what you saw. not converted to 23.97 fps. oh well. |
February 25th, 2008, 09:23 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
Imagine if you used them to host all your videos and you missed the three-day notice...
|
February 26th, 2008, 01:09 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 479
|
That's really too bad, Stage6 was great.
__________________
Mark Utley |
February 26th, 2008, 01:11 AM | #4 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pahrump, NV
Posts: 24
|
Sucky, I just started using it recently.
|
February 26th, 2008, 05:46 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 959
|
|
February 26th, 2008, 06:45 AM | #6 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
You also in started it in Video Industry News where it should be. Hope you understand and there was certainly no malice intended. -gb- |
|
February 26th, 2008, 07:36 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 959
|
Greg, no harm no foul :)
|
February 26th, 2008, 09:07 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
Stage6's problem was that it allowed users to set their own parameters (that and needing to install it's own dedicated plug in). That meant uploaders could push the quality settings off the scale in order to preserve as much quality of the original as possible. However viewers woudl spend most of their time watching a "buffering" logo.
Say what you like about Vimeo, or let alone Youtube (or blipTV or Veoh, etc), the compromises they impose are designed to give the viewers a hassle free experience - "Give me convenience or give me death" as the Dead Kennedys said... Stage6 had the potential to be a great service, and I get the feeling that as comapny in general, DivX are on the side of the angels (well, at least on the side of content creators) but I'm not surprised it's being switched off... Last edited by Dylan Pank; February 26th, 2008 at 12:54 PM. |
February 26th, 2008, 12:06 PM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
Nothing was wrong with the Divx plug in. Worked great. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02...age6_shutdown/ They had an explosion in viewers from Oct to Jan 08.. nice problem to have. But not when you aren't bringing in the cash. |
|
February 26th, 2008, 12:30 PM | #10 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Like i said, it's not the service or the software that was a problem, it was that they allowed users to upload 90 minute 3MB/s vids. |
|||
| ||||||
|
|