|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 7th, 2007, 04:42 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
I can't imagine any major studio backing this format now that consumers are buying the other two types of players - who wants to be involved in making it a three-way race? A more plausible application would be for independent distribution to corporate clients who buy the player as part of the project, but even there I don't see it. Why mess with multiple layer breaks when Blu-ray holds 25 GB on a single layer, or just play HD files from a computer and skip all these disc-based format entirely?
|
November 7th, 2007, 05:26 PM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
quote: "Why mess with multiple layer ..."
money, man, money... why mess anyway with any of the new format to see what you already got on cheap DVD with a nice quality. the difference will be made today by writing on the media, not reading it. today people want to record more than 30 years ago. even 30 years ago with VHS, the success was based on the fact that you can record TV on a 180min VHS cheap VHS tape, not by the fact you can see a movie. all read only media were a failure at early stage (except CD , because it started a really new era in audio). and as soon the mp3 started, the CD was dying (people do care for size before quality). look at the success of Divx, how many people are just happy to look at movies that can fit a 700mb CD-R. and look at DVD, how many commercial DVD are really using the full capacity of DVD. most of them are encoded a 5Mb/s sec to fit a single layer, or a dual layer at best when many features are present. |
November 7th, 2007, 05:33 PM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Right, for any application where money is the primary concern you can just make a standard DVD for a few cents, or encode to one of the compressed HD formats on the same cheap disc and play that on a computer. There simply isn't a need for this new format and it has a type of complexity which is inherently problematic. Good luck to them recruiting "major studios."
|
November 7th, 2007, 10:15 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
Yeah and we all know how picky dual layer DVD discs are. Can you imagine what would happen to a multi layer disc with even the smallest scratch? How well is this format going to hold up over time?
What is up with the name too? NME = Enemy This format would have had a chance a year or two ago but not now. If consumers walked into a Store they are going to look at Toshiba or SONY as brandnames and not NME which nobody has ever heard of before. The same arguments that go against HD-DVD for not having more studio or hardware company support will really go against this format. The format really isn't all that much cheaper then HD-DVD anymore and a lot of people have already bought into HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. None of those people are going to jump on some wannabe format. |
November 8th, 2007, 09:55 AM | #20 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Olney, Maryland
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
The VMD bit rate blows away the standard DVD --- DVD is 9.8 Mbs as compared to VMD's 45Mbs. Quote:
Actually, the overall costs between Red Laser technology and BlueRay are dramatic. What does it cost to Author a BlueRay title...50 grand? The smaller independents films will naturally gravitate towards a more affordable format. How was NME able to beat the other two formats in releasing Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy? Affordability and a streamlined process built on existing technology. The Nintendo vs Playstation & Xbox is an interesting analogy. |
||
November 8th, 2007, 10:30 AM | #21 | |||||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
November 8th, 2007, 01:25 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
> "Unless you need some of the fancier menu features it's about $500 for a burner and another $500 or so for software, plus $50 for a few blank discs."
Don't forget AACS licensing for copy protection. http://www.aacsla.com/support/
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
November 8th, 2007, 06:12 PM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
hehe, an interesting result from a study shows that only 40% of PS3 owner are aware that their gamebox include a Blu-ray reader.
http://www.youtube.com/v/MFoyp71xw3w |
November 9th, 2007, 03:50 PM | #24 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
I was hoping to say "Blu-Ray Strikes Back," but probably not. From IMDb (and yes, the money HD DVD gave to Paramount/DreamWorks helped):
'Is Sony Signaling End of War Over HD Video? In the first hint that he may be reconsidering whether to continue the battle with Toshiba over high-definition video, Sony chief Howard Stringer said Wednesday that the format battle between the two companies has become "mostly a matter of prestige." In a speech in New York Thursday night, Stringer also suggested that the battle over Sony's Blu-ray system and Toshiba's HD DVD "doesn't mean as much as all that." At one time, he suggested, it might have been possible to unify the two formats, and if time travel were possible he would try to do that now. He decried the decision of Paramount/DreamWorks to sign an exclusive deal (worth a reported $150 million) to release films exclusively in the HD DVD format. "We were trying to win on the merits, which we were doing for a while, until Paramount changed sides," Stringer said.' heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
November 9th, 2007, 04:22 PM | #25 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
Maybe we WILL see a compromise. I do think in the long run that would be best.
Mike
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. |
November 10th, 2007, 02:58 AM | #26 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East London, South Africa
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
|
November 10th, 2007, 09:19 AM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 86
|
They don't even know what the data transfer rate for Blu-ray is.
40Mbps for movies 48Mbps for movie + audio Higher yet for data http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc |
November 13th, 2007, 01:27 PM | #28 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Olney, Maryland
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
November 13th, 2007, 01:54 PM | #29 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Perhaps, but that's not particularly relevant to most of us. What is relevant is that anyone can make a Blu-ray disc today with a modest initial investment and market that to millions of people buying Blu-ray capable devices. Or you can pay a few hundred dollars to have an HD-DVD title authored and distributed by the company Microsoft is backing to help get that format off the ground. The odds of a third format catching on with consumers and being supported by standard disc authoring programs is slim at best.
|
December 29th, 2007, 10:50 AM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Olney, Maryland
Posts: 197
|
HD VMD update
Well, to update the release of the product...
HD VMD players finally began to ship after 3 years of development. I believe they became available to the US market just after Christmas (Dec 27) through the PCrush distributor. 10,000 units ordered by the US distributor and 10,000 units ordered by the central Europe distributor. http://www.nmeinc.com/production.aspx Now, I'm waiting to read an actual review of the player. _______________________________________ Notes from the interview w/ the CEO: http://www.wallst.net/superstocks/su...=4216&play=yes Initial version of HD VMD will be at the 25 gig range. 6 Month target: 1) Mass adoption of the HD VMD format 2) PC Market / release a software & VMD Drive (player) for PC's 9 Month target: 1) Release Recordable VMD & authoring software / target industrial archiving 12 month target: 1) VMD Blue ray (100 gigs) 2) VMD used in GAME machine industry |
| ||||||
|
|