|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 3rd, 2007, 03:32 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 71
|
I am afraid & shure the way to control focus, aperture and zoom while shooting will be awful .. so its great for special things, but will not replace a real motion camera, even if the quality is better.
A Idea how to handle the datarate: maybe the cam doesnt record a real image (jpeg) sequence but uses a interframe codec like H.264 - later, when you acess a single image, it generates a jpeg from it. This might be a chance to handle the datarate. But this also might cause the image quality of a "interpolated" serial image is much lower then what we know from other photo cams. This also needs a very powerful internal processor - anybody out there owning a desktop Mac or PC which can do high Quality H.264 encoding @60fps in realtime ? |
September 3rd, 2007, 05:03 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep South, U.S.
Posts: 1,526
|
I really want to do good slow motion. This may fit the bill. I am not yet ready to move up from SD and good slow mo would really help enhance some of the nature stuff I video as well as give me a good cam to do stills.
__________________
Mark videos: http://vimeo.com/channels/3523 Stock: http://www.pond5.com/artist/mark29 |
| ||||||
|
|