|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 31st, 2010, 11:15 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 45
|
Twixtor vs After Effects Timewarp
I've never used twixtor, I've seen those amazing 1000fps DSLR videos.
I have done some similar things in after effects Timewarp with mixed results. Does anyone know the difference between the two options? Is twixtor anything more then Timewarp at maxed out settings? |
November 9th, 2010, 03:06 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Posts: 294
|
Interesting question!
(I was just looking for the AE equivalent of Optical Flow and learnt it's Timewarp.) I'm curious about any reaction on your question.
__________________
Brainstormnavigator searching for the hole in the sky..... Audiovisual Designer (NL) - http://www.brokxmedia.nl |
November 11th, 2010, 05:30 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I use Twixtor all the time, but rarely for slowing things down, only for speeding them up. (Primarily 30p to 24p) Anytime you are adding synthetic frames, the concern is abnormal artifacts. When you are removing frames, there is less chance of that. I use Twixtor to slow things down as well, and while the results are better than any other solution I have found, they are by no means what I would call perfect. My footage is pretty intense, so the motion estimation engine frequently miscalculates. I find the most issues near the edge of the frame, especally when the camera is moving.
The Foundry recently released a plugin called Kronos, that you may want to look into as well.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
May 25th, 2011, 11:34 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 552
|
Re: Twixtor vs After Effects Timewarp
Both are good, I the twixtor workflow takes longer but I reckon the results look better.
|
| ||||||
|
|