|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5th, 2011, 02:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 5
|
Compatibility with Canon XF300/305?,
Is the Nanoflash compatible with the xf300/305; and if there is any way to know, with the upcomint 100/105 or the newer canon announced at BH today?
|
|
|
|
January 5th, 2011, 04:30 PM
|
#2 |
|
Sponsor: Convergent Design
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 166
|
Canon XF300/305 and XF100/105
Hello Richard,
The nanoFlash works very well with the Canon XF305, via SDI or HDMI, It is very versatile camera Offering 720p which we do not typically see on Canon's XHL1 or XHG1 Series. As well as it supports Compact Flash Media, and the nanoFlash supports Playback of Canon XF300 / 305 Files. As for the New unveiled camera's from Canon,the XF100 should work via HDMI and the XF105 Via SDI, and the Canon XA10 should work via HDMI As well as Panasonic's new AF-100 is another good companion to the nanoFlash Best Regards
__________________
Andy Mangrum, Tech Support Convergent Design, Inc |
|
|
|
|
January 6th, 2011, 05:39 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york city, new york
Posts: 594
|
andy-
thank you for the quick response. as for the newer canon offerings, the xf100, xf105, xa10- -is there any difference in the quality of the data if it ports thru hdmi (xf100 & xa10) or sdi (xf105)? -will the nanoflash support playback of canon xf100/105 or xa10 files? thanks in advance for any insights you can provide. be well rob |
|
|
|
|
January 6th, 2011, 06:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Rob,
HD-SDI and HDMI are the same quality. The nanoFlash supports playback of files from the XF100 and XF105. These cameras use CompactFlash cards and our 1.6.245 was designed to work with Canon's files. The Canon XA 10 camera uses SD cards, and the nanoFlash does not.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
|
|
|
|
January 6th, 2011, 07:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york city, new york
Posts: 594
|
dan-
thanks for the quick reply. i knew the nanoflash wrote to compact flash media but i did not realize that the camera's actual use of compact flash media was determinative for using the nanoflash. i always thought it was the access pipeline-sdi or hdmi- which determined whether a nanoflash could be used. thanks again. be well rob |
|
|
|
|
January 6th, 2011, 08:26 PM
|
#6 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Rob,
Your original question was if the nanoFlash could playback files from the XA 10. If the files are transferred from the SD card to a CompactFlash card, then we should be able to play the files. But, the nanoFlash can not read SD cards. The nanoFlash, of course, can record the HDMI output of the XA 10 and then play that back without a problem, but I did not think that was your question.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
|
|
|
|
January 7th, 2011, 11:33 AM
|
#7 |
|
Sponsor: Convergent Design
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 166
|
XF 100/105 Quality Difference
Hello Rob,
If I could just add to what Dan had mentioned, There is no Quality Difference between the two connection's, But depending on your application, You should consider the following SDI Is a Locking Connection and HDMI Is not, So if you may be shooting in a high Vibration or a on the Move environment then SDI would probably be the better choice, As for the camera's, They all use the same size sensor so the image quality should be rather similar, Things to consider would be size, accessories, and workflow for your given application. Best Regards
__________________
Andy Mangrum, Tech Support Convergent Design, Inc |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
