|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 3rd, 2011, 01:27 PM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Sony NEX-VG10 + nanoFlash Working
Dear Friends,
Mr. Gerardo Campos has been testing the NEX-VG10 with the nanoFlash. He has been able to obtain an HDMI output free of icons and viewfinder detail, and free of the "Standby" icon, etc. And he has proven that the NEX-VG10 actaully puts out 1080psf29.97 (1080p30). Using the features of the nanoFlash, one can obtain 1080p23.976 (1080p24) with audio. We expect to be able to obtain 1080p25 from the 1080i50 version of the NEX-VG10, but this has not been tested yet.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
January 3rd, 2011, 03:22 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Friends,
Here are some additional instructions provided by Gerardo: 1. To remove all the viewfinder info in the screen you must push the button DISP on the camera, ... but if you still have the STBY in your screen, you have two ways to take it off: A. Start to record in camera. B. Remove the memory card from the camera. The other important thing is that the camera must have "SHOOT W/O LENS" enabled In the nanoFlash he has: System|Video|Record PSF>Prog enabled And to record 24p he has: Video|Crank 24 24 which sets the base frame rate to 24 and a crank rate of 24.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
January 3rd, 2011, 08:48 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
Wow... I find this to be quite interesting!
Does this produce true 23.976 footage with the proper temporal signature? |
January 3rd, 2011, 10:24 PM | #4 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
The vg10 does 25 or 30. He likely is only recording 24 frames butq it's not 24 per second because the timebase remains 1/30th second.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
January 3rd, 2011, 10:36 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
Yeah, that's what I am thinking too.
I'd like to hear his opinion on its look. |
January 5th, 2011, 07:24 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
I find this very sketchy. The fact is that a still life with a very slow focal change is not going to tell us enough about how the frame rate is being recorded. If he was on camera talking, it would be better so at least we could see if the frames were being dropped or held over. Or a simple medium speed pan.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
January 5th, 2011, 08:56 AM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear William,
This may not be what you actually need, but there is some motion in this shot. It will appear to be static at first. http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/converge...ml#post1604300
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
January 5th, 2011, 09:20 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
Thanks for the link. It looks a little choppy but it's hard to tell with the way the shot is set up. I can't go frame by frame to check to see what is happening. Perhaps there's a way with Vimeo that I am overlooking.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
| ||||||
|
|