|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 11th, 2010, 05:33 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Australia
Posts: 374
|
NanoFlash Picture Profile Question
Hello All,
I have a question given that the NanoFlash records a native SDI signal that bypass's the camera's encoder, if changes are made to the picture profiles do they have any effect the SDI signal recorded the NanoFlash. I have made some profile changes on my EX3 and can see changes to the signal recorded to the SxS cards but can not see the effect on the NanoFlash File. |
February 11th, 2010, 05:43 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 218
|
Profiles on SDI output
Profile changes should be seen on recorded SxS as well as the HD-SDI.... both after camera paint/ shading adjustments... try something radical in the profile and you will see it.
|
February 11th, 2010, 06:59 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita
Posts: 590
|
George is correct. The SDI output will be affected by changing camera settings.
|
February 11th, 2010, 06:59 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Lance,
George is correct. The HD-SDI and SD-SDI signals are after any picture profiles for almost all cameras. The Thompson Viper, and maybe some other cameras, allow you to obtain a non-adjusted image, but these are exceptions.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
February 11th, 2010, 07:02 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita
Posts: 590
|
In the case of the Viper, it clearly has multiple SDI out. One is affected by camera settings, the others are not. Most cameras only have a single SDI out, or if they have 2 SDI out, they output the same signal.
|
February 12th, 2010, 02:02 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Australia
Posts: 374
|
Hey thanks guys,
George you are right small adjustment are harder to detect. |
| ||||||
|
|