|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 28th, 2009, 07:49 AM | #16 | |||||
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
.....However, when it comes to digital Cinema, then we're looking at a different set of delivery parameters. i.e. 35 MM cinema projection and 4K digital cinema projection, and possible 3D shooting with two identical cameras and XDR's. Green screen plate recording for heavy Adobe After Effects work and a film out at the end. .....To my way of thinking, the Flash XDR really hits its ultimate application in uncompressed digital cinema shooting and master VTR replacement, and of course, this would also be where the hyper expensive 64 GB cards become justifiable. Respectfully, Mark |
|||||
September 28th, 2009, 09:35 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Mark,
I was not trying to address uncompressed. I was trying to say that there is a very wide range of quality versus length of recording options available with the Flash XDR and nanoFlash, all without "Hot Swapping". For full uncompressed, four 32 GB cards in a Flash XDR gives you more recording time than a large film magazine. Four 64 GB cards gives you twice the recording time of four 32 GB cards. Competition should drive the price of the 64 GB cards down, once other manufacturers release their 64 GB or larger cards.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
September 28th, 2009, 10:38 AM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
My apologies for the misunderstanding. Yes, you are quite correct on this :-) Also, the addition of adding a hot swapping feature for use on long speech and sit down interviews (Like we're shooting now) would be a wonderful feature to have.
|
September 29th, 2009, 03:08 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jacksonville, VT USA
Posts: 100
|
We are constantly running into record length issues with the NanoFlash. With our high speed cameras the 1080p24 output is almost constant for the entire NFL game since we are expanding time. Stopping for even 30 seconds is a hindrance and quality is everything.
For longer (10 hour) events like the World Series of Poker Europe where we are simultaneously running 18 Nanos and XDR's at 50Mbs we would need to double our useage of Sandisk cards to run 2 cards at a time and as well have 2 sets. That increases cost greatly and some of you guys probably have still not forgiven me after I bought out B&H recently, lol. The thing that will be much more useful to us than the 64GB cards is hot swapping 32GB cards. That will end up saving quite a bit of cost for us. Jeff |
September 29th, 2009, 05:52 PM | #20 |
Convergent Design
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 869
|
Hot Swap and 64GB CF Cards
Hi Jeff, Mark-
We plan to give you both options: Hot Swap and compatibility with the 64GB Extreme Pro CF cards. We have already qualified the SanDisk 32GB Extreme CF card for all bit-rates. As soon as we can get the 64GB card we will also qualify it (or make appropriate changes to our firmware). The 32GB Extreme card worked with no code changes. Hot Swap is still on target for a November release. We are testing time-lapse code now (which looks fantastic at 220 Mbps) and hope to begin debug on over/under crank next week. Once this code is released we will work on hot-swap and loop-record. Naturally, reliability remains a key concern, so we always test the code across 10-15 boxes in which we record material over a week. That generates a ton of files to view and confirm, but it is time well spent. Best-
__________________
Mike Schell Convergent Design |
September 29th, 2009, 09:13 PM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
Hi Mike. I am glad to know how seriously and thoroughly you test your code. It's really amazing to see how you folks can actually keep adding features, which of course is adding value to our XDR's and Nano's. I have not even seen regular full motion video @ the 220 I frame setting yet, so I am quite excited to see the Timelapse as well.
|
October 8th, 2009, 03:54 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,222
|
While high, recall that new memory cards of the highest capacity have been in the $400-1000 range for the last few years. Understand that when memory manufacturers release product from a new fab at a higher density, initially, their yields are very low. So, you pay more until the yields are higher. Even are these seemingly exorbitant prices, many are sold at or below actual cost.
|
October 8th, 2009, 04:58 PM | #23 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
Some Time & Some More Perspective
Quote:
.....As someone else pointed out on this thread, the newer, faster CF card memmory is probably coming from a new manufacturing process and/or facility with possibly much smaller production yields. Therefore, one can expect to pay somewhat higher prices for the faster, newer memmory. Obsteporus Chris the Rex pointed out that memmory prices head in one direction - down, so maybe as time and higher yields take hold, we will start to see some more realistic pricing on the 60 and 90 MB per second CF media from Sandisk. |
|
October 8th, 2009, 05:32 PM | #24 |
Convergent Design
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 869
|
New 64GB Card Looks Very Promising
Give us another day or so of testing, but I am optimistic that we may have found a new 64GB CF card that lists for $300 and is capable of all bit-rates up to 220Mbps.
More info in a few days. Best-
__________________
Mike Schell Convergent Design |
October 8th, 2009, 08:32 PM | #25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
... Now this is what I'm talking about. Thanks Mike. This is reasonable.
|
October 9th, 2009, 10:20 AM | #26 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Mike,
What card are you checking out? Very interested. Thanks, Garrett |
October 9th, 2009, 02:09 PM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 43
|
Sounds like the Photofast cards that Rob Galbraith reviewed positively.
Rob Galbraith DPI: SanDisk, Transcend and PhotoFast roll out speedy cards up to 64GB Photofast Compact Flash* SDHC Class 10 CFAST CF Flash Cards |
October 9th, 2009, 02:50 PM | #28 | |
Convergent Design
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 869
|
Quote:
Yes, this is the one! Initial test results look very good. I'll have more info next week. Best-
__________________
Mike Schell Convergent Design |
|
October 9th, 2009, 04:48 PM | #29 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Thanks Mike and Mike,
Looking forward to more info. Garrett |
October 9th, 2009, 07:15 PM | #30 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,138
|
CF Media Performance & Prices Dropping Dramatically
Hi Mike & Mike:
I must say I'm quite encouraged to see how fast the price is dropping versus performance on the newer CF card media. It looks like we will be seeing 64 GB CF cards in the $300.00 range, which will allow much higher Long GOP data rate recording on the XDR and Nano. :-) Yay ! |
| ||||||
|
|