|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 14th, 2009, 06:31 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
September 14th, 2009, 07:52 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Convergent Design
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 869
|
Quote:
Yes, you would select the PSF-In box when shooting progressive mode on the EX1/3. This would ensure that each frame is proceesed as progressive and not interlaced. The HD-SDI signal for 1080i60 and 1080psf30 look identical, so you need to tell the nanoFlash to process as progressive. Best-
__________________
Mike Schell Convergent Design |
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2010, 11:51 AM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Just read this thread and I am bumping it for the new nanoFlash users. This is an important topic for most, if not all those using the device.
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2010, 01:28 PM
|
#19 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 218
|
Sticky... the time has come
This topic begs for a concise sticky written by some of the greatest nanoFLASH minds of our generation. Also in this sticky a section detailing each common camera model and the right settings for each rez and framerate. This may reward the lazy (too lazy to do tests), but could reward Convergent Design to a greater extent since there will be more happy users who will not "blow" a shoot.
Cameras to start with: EX1, EX-3, the new 350 XDCAM EX, Panasonic Cams.. HDX-900. I just printed out the output specs of the HDX-900 HD SDI. Previous post is correct about Panasonic HDX.. all of it is over 60i so seems a good candidate for PSF check box. Right? Wrong? I can post the HDX-900 output spec page if anyone would like a reference copy. |
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2010, 07:10 PM
|
#20 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
The PSF In box should be checked for progressive and unchecked for interlace. For NTSC, if I never shoot 30p, I could leave the box unchecked and it would be set correctly whether I shoot interlace or 24p. Is that correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2010, 08:39 PM
|
#21 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear Tom,
Yes, in your case, since you never shoot 1080p30 or 1080p29.97, you could leave the Record PSF>Prog(ressive) box unchecked. Yes, we automatically set the flag, internally, if your footage is 1080p24, 1080p23.98 (1080p23.976). And if you leave the Flag unchecked, we will process 1080i60, 1080i59.94, as interlaced.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2010, 09:59 AM
|
#22 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vientiane (Lao PDR)
Posts: 349
|
Psf exist on a stream or on tape, but once the picture is wrote as a digital file, is just PROGRESSIVE.
Can be read again as psf if needed, but must be processed as any Progressive image. When the clips gets recorded in the NANO there is nothing on the file that tell us that once they where psf. rafael |
|
|
|
|
February 15th, 2010, 01:22 PM
|
#23 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Dear George,
This may help: If you set your camera to record progressive, then check "Record PSF>Prog". If you set your camera to record interlaced, then uncheck "Record PSF>Prog". Examples: If you set your camera for 1080i59.94, and you see 1080p29.97 on the nanoFlash, then uncheck "Record PSF>Prog". If you set your camera for 1080p29.97, and you see 1080i59.94 on the nanoFlash, then check "Record PSF>Prog". If the nanoFlash shows you a frame rate that is the same as you have setup in your camera, then it is setup properly.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
