|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 25th, 2007, 07:08 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 135
|
HDMI ingest to AspectHD
would it be better quality (lets say color space or quantity of pixels) an HDV-on-tape image captured by HDMI Intensity to AspectHD, than by firewire to AspectHD? In my case from a Canon HV20.
|
|
|
|
June 25th, 2007, 07:15 AM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 166
|
you will get better quality using the intensity by bypassing the hdv compression that occurs going to tape
|
|
|
|
|
June 25th, 2007, 08:16 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
But if you're playing back your HDV tapes over HDMI there is zero quality improvement whatsoever. HDMI ingest only has an edge if you're capturing 'live'.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
|
|
|
|
June 25th, 2007, 09:54 AM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockledge, Florida
Posts: 351
|
I belive you would however capture at 1920x1080 rather than 1440x1080 (blown up from 1440x1080 however). Yes....you can do this in post but I believe it is probably best to do this in cam (IMHO...I might be wrong).
|
|
|
|
|
June 25th, 2007, 10:04 AM
|
#5 |
|
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Likely the opposite, software upscaling algorithms are more flexible than is probably in consumer hardware. This is not a big factor either way.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
