|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 5th, 2007, 01:34 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,414
|
express slot to pci-e adapter
PCIE2EXP
http://www.getcatalyst.com/adapter_m..._pcie2exp.html anyone know if you can use the AJA cards with this on a dell laptop? man would that be great if it worked.. |
May 5th, 2007, 03:14 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Patterson La.
Posts: 207
|
Looks shady at best...but would be cool as hell
|
May 5th, 2007, 08:04 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 853
|
This just became available. I got an email from them but I don't know anything about the product. http://www.magma.com/products/pciexp...ox1/index.html
|
May 5th, 2007, 08:29 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Patterson La.
Posts: 207
|
Magma is a goog company David,
little help would be needed to make BM pcie a viable lappy card |
May 6th, 2007, 04:01 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
I've been in contact with Magma for quite some time. I think they've had Intensity working on a Mac using that new set-up but I have no word on PC. Don't see why it wouldn't work though.
One thing to point out though is that there is a lot of technical trickery going on in the background, and some machines work better than others. Magma recommend high-end Sony laptops and have had bad performance issues with Dell, for example. They have a driver for problematic machines that improves performance, but they still warned me off using a Dell at all for video work. It's also worth pointing out that their previous PCI to ExpressCard adaptor isn't quite as fantastic as their website says it is. It works absolutely fine with my Firewire card, but bluescreened with my Sweetspot SD component capture card, and anything that uses a VFW driver as opposed to a DirectShow/WDM driver won't work at all. With regards using an AJA Xena card - well, in theory the bandwidth is there but it is a x4 card if memory serves and ExpressCard only has x1 bandwidth.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
May 12th, 2007, 09:24 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 70
|
Here's the email I recieved about their expressbox. Haven't had a chance yet to call them direct and ask about it.
"Hello Tim- Thank you for your inquiry. Both the AJA and Decklink cards have been tested with the ExpressBox1 and both cards are compatible. We have (2) enclosure options available depending on the length of the PCIe card: EB1H – ExpressCard to PCI Express (fits a PCIe card shorter than 6.604”) – Price: $729.00. EB1F – ExpressCard to PCI Express (fits a PCIe card longer than 6.604”) – Price: $749.00. Current Lead-Time: 2-5 business days after the receipt of the order. Our PCI expansion products are sold with: · 30 day money back guarantee · 1 year return to factory warranty If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me directly at 858-530-2511 ext: 2200 or via email at jkohlhorst@magma.com. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Best regards- Jill Kohlhorst Account Executive MAGMA A Disabled Veteran Company 9918 Via Pasar San Diego, CA 92126 www.magma.com w: 858.530.2511 x2200 fax: 858.530.2733 jkohlhorst@magma.com" |
May 13th, 2007, 02:00 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
It's a serious amount of money and I would be emailing asking for clarification about compatibility with the specific notebook you intend to use the interface with.
The plain and simple fact is that the ExpressCard port is rarely used in this manner, so there are cases where a specific notebook's BIOS doesn't support it. In the case of my Dell M1210 for example, the ExpressCard to PCI expansion actually crashes the computer if it is inserted on start-up. You need to boot without the card inserted, hot-plug it in later and let the Magma driver take over. Far less trickery is involved with an ExpressCard to PCIe interface, but performance will still change significantly from one notebook to the next. It is against this forum's rules to post emails, but Magma's engineer strongly recommends HP and Sony platforms and mentions latency issues with Dell machines to the point where he says that with applications that use a high interrupt frequency he "would definitely steer clear". I am assuming that a bandwidth-saturating task such as HD ingest would definitely be such a case.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
May 13th, 2007, 01:27 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 853
|
Also, we haven't characterized mobile chipsets in terms of CPU horsepower for RT ingest of HD-SDI. I *think* you'll probably be okay using the fastest Merom processor - 2.33GHz and at least 1GB of fast memory. - but it'll be close. Both memory slots need to be populated.
|
May 13th, 2007, 02:25 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
for 729$ you could build a barebone pc from an asus box.
Just add a handle at top of the box |
May 14th, 2007, 12:53 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Santa Rosa is essentially identical to the current Core 2 chipset, the difference being a new socket type and a boost in front side bus frequency to 800MHz - another factor that will help CineForm performance.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
|
May 14th, 2007, 01:01 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 853
|
Agreed - we would expect good performance increase with Santa Rosa at 2.6GHz+ and 800 MHz FSB.
|
May 14th, 2007, 05:35 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 70
|
Also, all the laptops I've seen with an expresscard come with Vista, which no one is supporting at the moment.
|
May 14th, 2007, 08:16 PM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
|
|
May 16th, 2007, 02:30 PM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
|
|
May 16th, 2007, 11:55 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
No, Santa Rosa is the new chipset being used that will replace the current mobile Core 2 configuration. It'll be in laptops etc.
What you have there looks like a Mini-ITX board that will run with desktop Core 2 CPUs. That would be a great board to experiment with but unfortunately it has no PCI Express capabilities.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
| ||||||
|
|