|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 17th, 2006, 11:13 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Problems with Movement in Video
I have noticed that whenever the camera moves rather quickly or any fast motion, my Cineform intermediates fall apart. Example: a shot looking across a bay with Sea Gulls flying across the image. There is a doubled image of each seagull as they fly by. If the camera moves (pans) or a large moving image crosses nearby I see "interlaced lines" across the moving part of the image only.There is no problem with the HC-1 hooked up directly to a HD monitor. Image is sharp, even with lots of motion.
I use the Aspect HDV settings for my capture in PPro and HDlink in Vegas - both have these problems. I did notice with HDLINK that I kept the original CFHD Mpeg files. When I play these they have the same problem-but again the Tape played thru caamcorder and HD output does NOT have any issues. My preference, capture, and project setting are all 1080x1440 29.97fps interlaced - upper field first. DVD output is 720x480, 29.97fps interlaced-lowere field first. I've played with all of these to no avail. Today I tried capturing and making a quick DVD with the same footage in Pinnacle Studio 10.5. The image is PERFECT, no doubled image of the seagulls, no "interlaced like lines" across moving objects. So clearly, my camera, firewire cable, video card, memory, etc. are all setup and capable. It is disconcerting that Pinn Studio - a less then $100 program seems to give superior results. What could be the problem? Is my install somehow corupted? Should I uninstall Cineform and reinstall? |
August 17th, 2006, 11:23 PM | #2 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
The problem is not CineForm compression as we don't compress motion like you suggest. The fact that the MPEG files what we converted from has the same issue, you are most likely look at a computer presentation artifact. Interlaced material can look less than idea on a progressive computer display. Consumer tools like Studio, my aim to give good PC presentation, but that will not get you the best HD results -- Studio is likely showing only one field (use Bob display) to turn interlaced into progressive. If you primary concern is PC presentation, either shoot in a progressive mode like CF30 or deinterlace when rendering your output.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 17th, 2006, 11:41 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
In response to above, my clip properties are:
Type: AVI File Size 432.4mb Image Size 1440x1080 Pixel Depth 24 Frame Rate 29.97 Average Data Rate 11.7 MB/second Piexel Aspect Ratio 1.333 CineForm Visually Perfect File Details Contains 1 Video Track(s) and 1 Audio Track(s) Video Track 1 Frame Rate 29.97 Frame Size 1440x1080 Uncompressed Video Format is 8-bit YUV422 Project Settings General- Editing Mode Cineform HD RT Time Base 29.97 Frame Size 1440 Horiz 1080 vertical Pixel Aspect Ratio HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333) Fields Upper Field first Playback Settings - the 3 middle Cineform playback settings are checked Capture - CineForm HDV capture - capture miodule installed Video Rendering - Compressor - CineForm HD Codec, Millions+ colors I left out audio coding, and other items that were not image related. Does anyone see anything wrong in these settings? I am using a Sony HC-1 - camcorder at standard settings, no cineframe, no change from standard shutter speed etc. Attached are 3 frames with a Single Seagull flying across the bottom of the image. Does anybody have any idea what's causing this? How to fix? I have been racking my brains on this for quite awhile. I didn't include the Pinnacle Studio images, but there is a perfectly sharp Single Seagull in the same frames captured in Pinn Studio. Thanks - PK |
August 18th, 2006, 12:00 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
Last edited by Paul Kepen; August 18th, 2006 at 03:25 AM. |
|
August 18th, 2006, 08:37 AM | #5 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Somehow you are mixing the fields on export. This is not normal behavior. Try turning off "de-interlace while scrubbing". Another customer reported problems on export using that option (although is doesn't do it on my home version there could be a bug there.)
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 19th, 2006, 02:37 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
What are the DVD options I should use? I've used the NTSC widescreen DVD template in PPro, and customized by uping the bit rate, etc. I notice it defaults to lowere field first. HDV is upper field first - should I switch to upper field first for DVD output ? When I output to DVD the results are inferior (more jaggies) with PPro 1.5.1 versus Vegas+DVD Architect. The Adobe programs don't seem to offer as much customization as the Sony programs. However, I'm just using the export function of PPro- cause its faster for experimentation. Is the Quality any different with Encore? Do most people convert to 24P with Cineform before editing? Or just go with interlaced, or de-interlace with DV fim maker, majic bullet, etc.? Thanks David, have a good weekend |
|
August 19th, 2006, 02:50 PM | #7 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
"Video Rendering - Compressor - CineForm HD Codec, Millions+ colors"
Should say "CineForm HD Export" as the file type, not use the "Microsoft AVI" option. You may be use the old Premiere licensed components. Export you 1080i movie using "CineForm HD Export" set you DVD size and pixel aspect, and low field first. Once you have you SD CineForm master use that in Encore to create your DVD.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 20th, 2006, 11:39 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
When I goto "Export Movie," the General section default is - File Type: "CineForm HD Export." Then I click Video it lists Compressor: "CineForm HD Codec," Color Depth: "Millions+ of Colors" Frame Size: "1440h x 1080v," Frame Rate: "29.97," Pixel Aspect Ratio: "HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)." I believe this is what you said they should be. I have now made the AVI per above, and it plays perfectly in Media player - sharp, clean, and no double images. Question: When and how do I set it up to DVD resolution 720x480? (Encore will not import as an asset. It states resolution must be 720x480) Thank you again for all the time and effort you so generously provide. Last edited by Paul Kepen; August 20th, 2006 at 12:54 PM. |
|
August 20th, 2006, 01:31 PM | #9 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Within Export movie simply set the new size and field order to 720x480 low-field first. The resulting AVI will import into Encore DVD.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 21st, 2006, 09:42 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Thank you again David - I guess that seems obvious, but I didn't want to screw things up without being sure. Yesterday, I imported the full HDV res avi into Sony DVD Architect with no problems, and it did the down res on its own. It took 58 minutes to make 6 min. clip into a disk - that would equate to 2+1/2 days for an hour video (on a AMD 4200 X2 w 2 gig ram system). The disk looks very good overall-FAR better then anything else so far. However, those flying seagulls, still are double imaged when watching the video, but if you hit pause, there is no double image. I thought maybe this was just part of the HC-1 rolling shutter issue, but playing the tape directly to HD component input, there is not a double image appearance of the seagul in either playback or pause.
Were getting close, its greatly improved, but it still seems there must be some sort of field order error. I don't know, but since HDV is all upper field, and DVD is lower field, I would think this would cause this problem. Is there a work around, or is this "just the way it is"? Do I need a de-interlacer step somewhere in the work flow? Thanks Again-PK (really can't thank you enough for all your time and help) |
August 21st, 2006, 11:50 AM | #11 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Paul,
If you not seeing a double when paused, it mean the fields are correctly encoded as separate time intervals. If the motion looks smooth then the fields are in the correct order. Sounds like the disk is fine. To test use a regular DVD to a CRT TV -- HD LCD/Plasma display can do odd things to present an interlaced image as progressive.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 21st, 2006, 12:07 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
I did preview the disk on a Sony G-90 -3 CRT front projection system. The DVD player was a Sony S9000ES. I've viewed many of my reguar DV projects edited and put on DVD with this system. Tennis, Water, Snow skiing, etc. with lots of motion and we never had a double image effect. I will try previewing on an old 32" tv tonight. Like I said, overall it looked very good, sharp, clean, good color, contrast, etc. My only concern is with fast motion/action. Any ideas, or suggestions would be most appreciated. Have a Great Day and Thanks - PK |
|
August 21st, 2006, 12:19 PM | #13 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Paul,
For a double image we you either must have the field blended (which you said they are not -- "if you hit pause, there is no double image") or forward/reverse motion to indicate the fields are in the wrong order. If you have neither of these, the double is an artifact of the display device.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
August 24th, 2006, 12:29 AM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
|
|
August 24th, 2006, 08:38 AM | #15 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
There is something you are doing wrong, but your description is not leading to any conclusions. You can be mixing frame rate with blending, you could be mixing format, somehow, yet the "When you puase the play of the video it disapears" say that the video is fine. Video is nothing more that a series of frames, so you must be messing with the candence, which may give the illusion of a double image. You going to have to send us an example clip. Use "yousendit.com" and email yourself. Copy that link and email me it through DVInfo.net (click on my username.)
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
| ||||||
|
|