|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 28th, 2006, 12:17 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
i'll have to test it out....
joel |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2006, 05:03 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
Any results to comment on ?
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
|
|
|
|
March 4th, 2006, 05:59 PM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
Not yet...and I don’t think I will. I already had the 4.0 demo installed but my 15 days are up (never even tried it…)so I wont be able to compare, but i can still see how Ppro 2.0 handles CF24... I will be shooting an infomercial in the up coming weeks I may shoot a couple of scenes in CF24 to test it out, but I don’t really like the look thus far of CF24... too jerky...
Joel |
|
|
|
|
March 4th, 2006, 06:38 PM
|
#19 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,669
|
> but I don’t really like the look thus far of CF24... too jerky...
Well it will be unless you extract the 24P signal properly - as the Cineform people have been patiently trying to explain to you throughout this thread. Or are you saying you don't like the 24P look, per se? |
|
|
|
|
March 4th, 2006, 07:58 PM
|
#20 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
on the other hand i love CF30... but SD 30P is not very hard to achieve from 1080i video... Joel |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
