|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 9th, 2009, 07:58 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 110
|
Another Neo HDV to Neo HD question
I'm in the middle of a documentary, and I have a large number of 1440 x 1080 8 bit files from Neo HDV. If I upgrade to Neo HD, would there be any upside to converting those original avi files to 1920 x 1080 10 bit files? And if I do, I'm assuming that the Vegas veg would just reference the new files and pull them into Vegas as if they were the original files.
|
|
|
|
January 9th, 2009, 11:42 AM
|
#2 |
|
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Some definitely prefer to work with square pixel gained with 1920x1080 post, while you don't gain more detail from up-res source, you do gain more headroom and an easier effects workflow. A secondary benefit to running a 1920x1080 timeline means you post elements, graphic, fx, titles all have 33% more resolution what will show in a filmout or blu-ray master. You should make the jump to 1920x1080 for your next project. I'm not sure how Vegas handles if the source changes size mid project -- do some test first.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
