|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 3rd, 2008, 11:26 PM | #1 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
New CineForm releases for all product lines.
These new builds are recommended updates, many bugs fixes and enhancements for an all-round improved editing experience. See www.cineform.com for more details and to download your updates.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
December 4th, 2008, 11:01 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 85
|
David,
Thanks for the post about the updates! I've got them downloading. How's the work on the CS4 PPro plug-in coming along? Thanks, Roger |
December 6th, 2008, 03:44 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
Good release! Very stable now. Whatever you did, fixed the probs with the beta and it's running very smoothly and nicely.
|
December 6th, 2008, 04:20 PM | #4 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
We thought it was best to have a solid CS3 version before finishing CS4.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
December 7th, 2008, 05:50 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vienna/Austria
Posts: 187
|
The latest Prospect 4k (188) is much more resources demanding on my system.
Open "Windows task manager"-Memory management- The PF usage will be around 1.6 GB Previous version (183) will require around 1GB playing the same timeline. |
December 7th, 2008, 12:50 PM | #6 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Overall the later builds use less memory that previously, I think you test case has changed, such as you project or the updated revision of CS3. 80% of the PF usage is Premiere's caching. We do scrubbing in 32bit float more often now for quality reasons, that does use more cache, but it is not an efficiency problem of Prospect. You can switch to 8-bit in the Playback Settings panel.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
December 7th, 2008, 03:57 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vienna/Austria
Posts: 187
|
Test was done with Premiere PS2 on the same project.
I kindly ask more users who are using the latest version (188) to check and compare their memory usage, between this version to 183. Thanks! Johnnie |
December 8th, 2008, 07:14 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 132
|
Using latest Aspect HD build - am exporting an 18 minute project. Has ALWAYS failed to export - previous dump I was getting has been typical Adobe one: Error Compiling movie. Will report back with latest findings soon.
In the meantime, David - can you tell me what the new option "Use IP Structure (only for 4:2:2)" does? As I'm using HDV footage (HDlink'd to cineform avi's - I assume my clips are 4:2:0, so isn't an option to chose for me). Thanks. |
December 8th, 2008, 10:03 AM | #9 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Sorry that new feature is confusingly named. While HDV is 4:2:0 at the source, is bumped to 4:2:2 in the CineForm compressor. The IP structure is the two frame GOP compression which can save 20-30% in your data rate (particularly in Medium or High quality, less so in the Filmscan modes.) This was the hardwired default for YUV (4:2:2) encoding until this build where it is optional. The I-frame mode uses a little less memory during the encode, but will produce a bigger ouput.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
| ||||||
|
|