|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 13th, 2008, 06:22 AM | #31 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Try before you buy would be my advice.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
|
June 28th, 2008, 05:23 AM | #32 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Now, (sorry if I posted this for the nth time) I have a Quad core Q6700 and I still drop frames in MJPEG with my Intensity Pro... Is Cineform more efficent with high-end processors? And would it prevent dropped frames for my newly upgraded quad system?
|
June 28th, 2008, 05:34 AM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 201
|
Jack - I am surprised as that is a good CPU.Perhaps any of these suggestions may help.Forgive me if I state the obvious.Do the optimisations I suggested earlier in the thread.Make sure the HDD can keep up with the data rate.Make sure you have the latest BM design drivers.If you need to clean unistal everything before upgrading.Get Cineform definitely - it is multi thread aware and will use all cores on encoding.I haven't had a dropped frame for months now - not one.I am using my laptop just for video though so if you have other stuff that causes conflicts loaded it may impede performance i.e virus scanners etc.
|
June 28th, 2008, 09:42 AM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
A 2.33GHz Core 2 Duo will perform well with CineForm at 'high' quality level. A 2.66GHz Core 2 has more than enough horsepower for just any situation the codec will have to deal with using Intensity Pro.
Your Q6700 will give phenomenal CineForm performance, although I have to admit extreme surprise that your system is dropping frames with Blackmagic MJPEG.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
June 28th, 2008, 07:06 PM | #35 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Me too, The only possible ways this could make sense is My Vista memory score is only 4.8 while the rest is 5.8-5.9 or my hard drive is VERY fragmented or I should use a seperate capture drive.
And I think the latest drivers might be causing problems instead of fixing them. I haven't yet done a test capture in 720p but HDMI 1080i went a minute with no dropped frames on 1.8.4. It only took 20 seconds to drop frames in 720 on 2.0 software and so far, no one from Blackmagic is willing to reply to my support requests. I wish I could get Cineform, but we've blown our budget on the upgrade, I also wish it would be easier to purchase Cineform for instance like the "Steam" digital distribution technique where purchasing is all managed by the software. Cineform should launch a similar platform to get their software out to more people. And it'll be $170 for a hardware PCI SATA RAID and 2 250GB Seagate HDDs. Cheaper than Cineform... Last edited by Jack Zhang; June 28th, 2008 at 11:54 PM. |
June 29th, 2008, 06:49 AM | #36 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Update: It must be a hard drive issue or software issue cause I just captured 1min of HDMI 1080i footage again in 1.8.4 on a defragmented system drive and it never dropped a single frame. I'll try 720p60 again later.
720p results: still dropping frames... Even on 1.8.4. This time it's 5 seconds before it quits on the system drive. Revised results: Finally, installing a separate capture drive via SATA solved this problem. I went 1:35 without dropouts. The 20 second one was to the same drive but interfaced through USB 2.0, making it slower. Last edited by Jack Zhang; June 29th, 2008 at 09:36 PM. |
August 31st, 2008, 08:33 AM | #37 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Switched to EX1, and selling my complete mobile HDMI HD capture computer + Intensity card + HDTV monitor in Pelican rolling case for $999.
See here: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/private-c...i-monitor.html |
December 15th, 2008, 06:52 PM | #38 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 88
|
I finally got around to getting a Thinkpad Advanced Dock and a Intensity card and successfull captured some footage using cineform HDLink. Running Vista 64.
So for $170 at the Lenovo outlet, this seems like very economical solution. It doesn't really make the laptop setup that much bigger, adds about 7 inches behind the laptop. |
December 15th, 2008, 07:02 PM | #39 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Eric, do you have a link? I found it at 2x the price you quoted.
Also, this is only for IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad laptops, correct? Which Intensity card did you use - would it work with Decklink HD Extreme? What laptop specs would support it? |
December 19th, 2008, 07:11 PM | #40 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 88
|
It's in the outlet part of Lenovo, goto main lenovo webpage, click on "outlet products" on the bottom left. Here is direct link
ThinkPad Advanced Dock: CA250310U Lenovo Outlet Yes only thinkpad models. The only limitation seems to be half length PCI card, and 1x speed wise. Not sure on the specs of the card you mentioned. Oh and limit of 50 watts drawn power wise. But that is probably not a problem with these kind of cards. I got around to doing more experiments, the only problem I've run into is I can't boot the computer with the camera plugged in. So I have to wait for it boot up, then plug in the hdmi. Minor problem though. |
December 19th, 2008, 11:36 PM | #41 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Eric, I understand that you are capturing directly into Cineform.
Aspect or Prospect? What is the CPU utilization during HDMI capture with that port replicator? Is sound in-sync on clips longer than 10 minutes? Thanks. |
December 20th, 2008, 01:46 PM | #42 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 88
|
I'm using Aspect right now, will upgrade soon.
Did some test with sound synch, and I'm definietely having issues. Even with short 1 minute clips. Does this mean the computer isn't fast enough? The cpu is hovering around 90% |
December 20th, 2008, 03:43 PM | #43 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 201
|
Eric
Glad you have it working - the footage that this little card can produce is stunning.Is Vista optimised?There is a lot of stuff that you don't need.I mention this earlier in the thread.The other thing I mentioned in this thread here
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/cineform-...quirement.html is that my cores sometimes do get to 90 % but not at the same time.This is when recording to FilmScan 2. It see saws between them. Average is 70% when capturing to the High setting with my optimised laptop.No dropped frames.Sound Sync issues?Make sure you have the latest drivers for the intensity and also the latest build of Cineform. I have Neo HD not aspect so I use HDlink.Is that what you use? |
December 21st, 2008, 05:02 PM | #44 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 88
|
I've done some tests with the mediaexpress application that comes with the intensity card and successfully captured mjpg compressed footage without sound sync issues.
I went ahead and put a bare XP install on a hard drive to do the following tests: intensity control panel and turned on HD to SD down conversion and have successfully captured with cineform, SD footage. So this tells me everything is "working". I have moved to an external firewire drive, which has reduced the cpu usage about 8 %, down to around 80%. But when capturing 1080 footage, the sound can't even stay in sync for 30 seconds. Interesting enough, the cpu usages goes down another 5% if I capture film scan vs medium. But still out of sync. It seems my laptop is not quite fast enough to capture HD 1080. I wish I had a source to test 720p. |
December 21st, 2008, 06:07 PM | #45 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 88
|
Just hooked my Apple TV up to the intensity card and put it in 720p playback and played a podcast and successfully captured it in cineform without any audio drop out.
So now how to get 1080 |
| ||||||
|
|