|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2nd, 2008, 01:02 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
ProspectHD v3.2.4 Build 154 changes: question
One of the notes on the most recent fixes was the following:
" Fixed - Decoder now knows when it is being run within HDLink. This fix prevents the "Desktop Playback - Fast" mode from impacting quality for CineForm-to-CineForm resizng conversions " David, would you comment on this please? Since the final output quality of our material is very important to us, could this have affected some of our downsized output recently or in days past? If so, would it be worth re-outputting down-sized material, either in AVI or in MOV's (which we use for making our Flash movies)? Sometimes we've wondered at downsized quality...so please explain. |
February 2nd, 2008, 01:06 PM | #2 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Only an issue if you used "Desktop Playback - Fast", otherwise all was working correctly.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
February 2nd, 2008, 01:07 PM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
On second thought, we've been going from full sized MOV's to Flashs EXACTLY for that reason! Now I remember that trying to use downsized re-wrapped MOV's gave very poor quality flv's. That explains it. Last edited by Stephen Armour; February 2nd, 2008 at 01:12 PM. Reason: Adding info.... |
|
February 2nd, 2008, 01:23 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
Anyway, I'm glad you fixed it! Now I know I'm not going crazy..........yet.
I couldn't understand why those pesky MOV's gave such poor results! But the early ones I used were down-sized and re-wrapped from full size (1920x1080p) CF'ed AVI's. The full size MOV's are huge, but give good quality flv output. |
| ||||||
|
|