![]() |
#61 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 539
|
That's great news.
I think someone also alluded to this question earlier, but could there also be a 1440x1080 recording option for users of Aspect HD who aren't yet ready to move to Prospect HD? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 539
|
Would that then mean uncompressed PCM before encoding to MP2? Or are camcorders like the HV20 and V1U going through an encoding of MP2 384kbps on input, and decoding it back to PCM (from the MP2 file) before sending it out via the HDMI? (This could be a dumb question). Not to mention, an illogical design.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
HDMI is uncompressed for audio and video.
Regard 1440x1080 for Aspect HD. We potentially can add a scaler to the recording, but we don't know if it will fit. 1920x1080 image will work in Aspect HD, they will just run a little slow as the pipeline will scale 1920 to 1440 during timeline playback. However AE and other tools will still benefit from the full 1920x1080 image. So overall the 1920 image will likely be a big benefit, even for Aspect HD users.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fernandina Beach, FL
Posts: 562
|
Personally I would find throwing out 500 pixel of resolution on capture extremely painful... If spending around $2k for a capture solution designed mainly around improving quality, why not spend $500 to be able to take full advantage of it?
In my opinion, this device isn't for the consumer-end of the customer base, more for the quality-oriented pro-sumer to pro demographic, am I right? That being said, everyone's workflow and situation is different, I'm sure there's some people out there who would take advantage of it. With a hardware scaler, would it also be possible to capture directly to cineform compressed SD or uncompressed SD? One way to future-proof current DV projects, record to SD on the CineformRecorder and HDV to tape for future use if needed.... any thoughts guys? Carl |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 135
|
component in please
please consider seriously the component in. many canon xha1 and hv20 owners (like me) would immediately buy this device.
mobility: a solid case (nothing cheap plastic) with belt. and thread to hot shoes, stabilizers, magic arm hooks (or whatever is the word in english) for the hdmi 2 CF slots minimum to make possible film interviews and concerts non stop. easy menus. a lcd screen is useful both for recording and playback. but not a must. nice rca in and minijackout for headphones if possible good price, max 1k (we re indies...) dont forget pal-land and 25p!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 539
|
It depresses me that I can't buy this product now.
I really hope the wait isn't too long. It's perfect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Anyway, I am just hoeping that like the AJA IO, we have the option to chose the codec. I love everything else CineForm does by the way, how to process the files, remove the pulldowns, batching, etc, just not the codec at the end. Personally, I would want uncompressed (With CineForms's HDLink added live) and then I would batch compress to what I want, which maybe Cineform, ProRes422, or whatever. M |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 9
|
I am SOOO happy to be "stuck with the CineForm codec" Its is tough to beat for a VFX workflow on a budget. This coming year is going to be Huge for CineForm. Cant wait!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Michael,
You are asking for uncompressed, that is not really a codec in my eyes (codec = compressor / decompressor,) and it certainly wouldn't work for flash or single drive recording and be mobile at this size for HD. Look into the Colorspace Icon DDR, that is more what you are looking for. Selectable compression makes no sense in HD, as all the others are inferior for the market this unit is targeting. Quote:
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fernandina Beach, FL
Posts: 562
|
Agreed. I've been dreaming of this since my post awhile back trying to build a capture solution....
I wake up at night with images of this thing stuck in my head. =D Cineform is perfect for this. No other portable capture solution would even compare. Carl |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
You have HDMI, but then use the CineForm codec. I would just like the option to choose. Now don't get me wrong, the hardware concept looks awesome and combined with HDLink, it is even better! M Note: the Colorspace Icon DDR's website says HDMI is coming!!! Now that is intriguing! I will call them to see how options compare... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Michael, you seem to be looking for a different device than what is being offered here.
Here Cineform offers a Cineform codec-based capturing box. That's what most people would want, I think. If that's not what you want, you are in the wrong bar :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
I Wanna Be A Cowboy!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3
|
With and Without Screen Options
Count me in the camp that can see the advantage of having this unit be as small as possible with no screen (and added screen costs). I've been looking for some *superior* (be it Cineform/ProRes/what have you) way of capturing a full 1920x1080 HD sequence without squeezing it to 1440 and subsequently squeezing it onto tape in HDV. But I'd like something that can sit snug under an HV20 or similarly-sized camera and not add weight and bulk to it. (I'd really like to be able to fly the two on a SteadicamJR or a Merlin.)
Having now shot with the additional Brevis35 setup, I *can* see the merits in a screen if you're giving a decent Noga-arm-enhanced way of monitoring your HD, for the sake of shooting with lens-adapters, say. But in this case you're considering a reasonably nice and higher-res display, not a cheap LCD, and possibly combining multiple purposes (after all, there are monitors out there for this.) Otherwise, I just don't see the use of an LCD for menus unless they honestly add no cost to the unit. We just need the smallest replacement for an Intensity-tethered-laptop that we can get. I say stick to the basics and drive the price as low as possible; small, compact, HD storage via HDMI (or optional alternate inputs if it doesn't bloat the device/cost). I could also support the notion of adding small micro drives if it meets a certain size profile that makes sense...But CF works for me if it reduces weight/size/cost. I think the lower you can get the cost and satisfy the basic needs, the better your chance of success and the broader your potential buyers. You've got to imagine exactly what the advantage of this is over the clunky RAID-tethered laptop with an Intensity card...that is doable today. And you've also got to come close to the price point of that combo, or beat it. All in all, though, good thinking...and I can't wait to see what it becomes. Something like this couldn't get here soon enough for me... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,095
|
Just as a quick exploration of the possibilities, I could see instances where the LCD screen could be very useful . . . you're now talking about not only an absolutely revolutionary recording device, but a dedicated CineForm player device as well . . . uses could now range from super-high-fidelity recording to digital projection in digital-cinema-quality 10-bit to something you can quickly export a high-quality edited timeline in Premiere or FCP to and then take to a client for portable playback anyplace/anywhere.
It would be like the super-professional video iPod for indie cinema :) Last edited by Jason Rodriguez; November 16th, 2007 at 12:56 AM. Reason: ipod reference |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|