December 27th, 2007, 10:14 AM | #241 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
http://www.convergent-design.com/CD_...DConnectMI.htm |
|
December 27th, 2007, 10:42 AM | #242 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 613
|
Nope, sorry man, checked it out and it still needs to be plugged in and, I'm not sure, I just took a quick look around in the manual, but it looked like it needed to use a computer application for it to work.
__________________
"Babs Do or Babs Do not, there is no try." - Zack Birlew www.BabsDoProductions.com |
December 27th, 2007, 12:19 PM | #243 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 65
|
You need to connect it to a computer to set the options, but not to run.
As for 'plugged in', I thought you meant AC. |
December 27th, 2007, 12:23 PM | #244 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 65
|
But speaking of power, it would be nice to see this unit with the flexibility of the Nebtek monitors, with screw mounts for all major battery mounts, and a 2.1mm DC for power in. That way it will work for anybody's set-up just by adding the mount you need or running off existing battery power taps.
|
December 29th, 2007, 10:27 PM | #245 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
OK, Sony has a HDV camcorder HVR-Z7U now that records to CF cards on-board.
This is one step in the right direction, although apparently, it still records m2t's (after compression.) Next step: can Sony please wake up and adopt the Cineform codec to record in this format, again on-board, Before Compression, on solid media? |
December 30th, 2007, 05:14 AM | #246 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
Good luck with that! I'd expect Sony to introduce yet another proprietary system if they ever moved in that direction.
__________________
Company Website: Digital Foundry Ltd Video Games HD Blog: Digital Foundry@Eurogamer |
January 1st, 2008, 04:54 PM | #247 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 34
|
Questions
There are some things that I would like some clarification on:
1. Will the SOLID use any portable USB 2.0 hard drive? Will it work with the drives that use the USB port to power them? Is it possible to connect more than one drive at a time? 2. Will the SOLID upconvert/upsample the 8-bit uncompressed HD stream from my V1U to 10-bit Cineform HD? In real time? 3. Will the SOLID upscale 1440x1080 to 1920x1080, or is that still to be determined? Will it upscale in real time? (I would really like to have my video upscaled to 1920x1080) 4. How would you select to record in different frame rates such 24p or 30p, on the camera, the SOLID, or both? 5. I have a Mac and I use Final Cut Pro (version 5.1.4), what Cineform codec would I have to purchase so that I could edit in Cineform without converting to any other inferior codec to edit? Also, this isn't so important, but is the white exterior of the SOLID going to stay white? Or is black going to be optional? (I would much rather have black) The name SOLID sounds like something that RED would come up with. Why not name it The Cineform Medium I? Thanks and have a Happy New Year! |
January 1st, 2008, 06:11 PM | #248 | |||||||
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
|||||||
January 1st, 2008, 07:51 PM | #249 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 34
|
Thanks for your quick reply. I spent several hours yesterday reading the whole forum about the SOLID. I have read so many articles and e-books that say that the V1U outputs 1440x1080 through the HDMI port, but they never have used the HDMI port on any of these cameras. So I'll believe you and I'm very happy to here that my camera can output 1920x1080.
|
January 2nd, 2008, 07:17 AM | #250 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 142
|
One alternate suggestion for the Audio in, is 1/4" TRS jacks, they're small form factor, balanced line, fairly rugged, less prone to interference than RCA, and easily converted to XLR, RCA, or 1/8" mini if that floats your boat. But the big selling feature is the reassuring snap that you get when you plug them in, that you don't get with RCA plugs. XLR obviously has a nice locking mechanism, but if it's cost prohibitive, 1/4" TRS would be the way to go.
A cheap alternative to the flip function would be to have mounting screw holes on both sides of the monitor so you could just mount it "upside down" if necessary. Flip the overlay menu on the screen instead of the image. If a component version ended up being $100 more like the difference between the Intensity and Intensity Pro, I don't think anyone could really complain about that. I think the name of it should be the CineForm F**K YEAH! :-) that might be a tough marketing issue though. |
January 2nd, 2008, 02:32 PM | #251 | ||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Just found this thread - hats off to Cineform for recognizing the value of the user community in developing product functionality.
My background is in broadcast/corporate production... cameras costing many tens of thousands of dollars are commonly used. Like many in that market, I don't want to own such a camera, because the next project will require something different - I'll rent. However (like many in that market), I do own a V1 and am giving serious consideration to an EX1 in the future, cameras that can work well on lower-budget and self-funded projects. Speaking for this type of user, there are a few pro/broadcast features that make it much more likely that I'd integrate the "Solid" in more projects. Quote:
Will the Cineform file container support multichannel audio? Getting camera audio in 2 channels and 2 more channels with mixer output line-level and A-D would be pretty cool. Quote:
Timecode!!! I tried to read every post in this thread and could find nobody talking about timecode! My understanding is that camera timecode is not present in the HDMI interface spec. (?) PLEASE don't have every clip start at "0:00.00" and call it good. You'd cut off a significant piece of the market that uses timecode for sync of multiple cameras (that'd be sales of multiple Solids!) and dual-system sound. Ideally there would be a jammable TC generator that would timestamp each clip. Finally, and I know this has been touched on above, there are lots of event videographers out there who need media for 4 hours or so. CF is great, don't get me wrong, but only represents the piece of the market that either work on short-form projects, or can dump to laptop frequently (not as portable as some need), or can afford lots of CF. An internal or strap-on hard drive would be essential for many purchasers. |
||
January 2nd, 2008, 02:52 PM | #252 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
|
January 3rd, 2008, 10:27 AM | #253 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 220
|
**SIGNS UP** for beta testing!
|
January 3rd, 2008, 10:50 AM | #254 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: cape town South-Africa
Posts: 251
|
Anybody related to Oprah or Bono ? Please ask them to donate towards
African Filmmakers. I need one of those / The HDSDI version. Will send postcard of me, shooting whatever .......... |
January 3rd, 2008, 11:07 AM | #255 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
EDIT: Okay okay, I'd actually go for it with component I/O too...either way, just don't forget the folks sitting on the border with the 110's. Jeffery Haas shooter-editor-JVC 110 owner Mansfield TX |
|
| ||||||
|
|