25 fps higher quality than 29.97? at DVinfo.net

MusarInteractive · November 23rd, 2001, 12:06 PM

Hi all,

At the CanonDV site - www.canondv.com - the following claim is made in promoting the virtues of the XL1 PAL:

"A slower playback speed serves a higher quality picture"

Would someone explain this to me? I could understand the claim that a greater number of pixels in PAL format might yield higher quality results, but is it also true that slowing frame rate somehow improves picture quality?

Thank you.

Tim

Don Palomaki · November 23rd, 2001, 04:00 PM

As I understand it, PAL gives more scan lines lines for improved vertical resolution with the same horizontal resolution. Also, the PAL signal format gives more reliable/repeatable color information. The 25 vs. 30 fps frame rate allows the higher vertical resolution within the same bandwidth.

November 23rd, 2001, 12:06 PM	#1
MusarInteractive New Boot Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Franconia NH 03580 USA Posts: 19	25 fps higher quality than 29.97? Hi all, At the CanonDV site - www.canondv.com - the following claim is made in promoting the virtues of the XL1 PAL: "A slower playback speed serves a higher quality picture" Would someone explain this to me? I could understand the claim that a greater number of pixels in PAL format might yield higher quality results, but is it also true that slowing frame rate somehow improves picture quality? Thank you. Tim Last edited by MusarInteractive; November 23rd, 2001 at 01:48 PM.

November 23rd, 2001, 04:00 PM	#2
Don Palomaki Wrangler Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Northern VA Posts: 4,487	As I understand it, PAL gives more scan lines lines for improved vertical resolution with the same horizontal resolution. Also, the PAL signal format gives more reliable/repeatable color information. The 25 vs. 30 fps frame rate allows the higher vertical resolution within the same bandwidth.