|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 28th, 2002, 07:50 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne AUST
Posts: 12
|
xl-1 phantom power
can i use the power out on the standard mic socket to get phantom power for my bayerdynamic shotgun?
Or does the MA-100 or 200 provide phantom power Or is there a cheap accessory i can add in-line to power my mic? |
August 28th, 2002, 08:26 PM | #2 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The Rolls PB223 is a dual phantom power supply. One of the sponsors, Zotz Digital http://www.zotzdigital.com/?page=shop/browse&offset=40&category_id=&keyword=phantom&company_id= has them instock. The MA-100/200 do not supply phantom power.
Jeff |
August 30th, 2002, 06:07 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
There is NO phantom power from the XL1 or the MA100/200. The power provided from the XL1 to the MA-100/200 and Canon mics is 5 volts DC and is not appropriate for most mics that use phantom power.
|
August 30th, 2002, 09:28 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 107
|
Murray:
...or of course, if you have access to one, you could connect your Beyerdynamic to a field mixer like the Shure 32, and run your Phantom power for the mic from that. The mixer should plug OK into both the MA-100 and 200 with the line setting. Ram |
August 30th, 2002, 08:47 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne AUST
Posts: 12
|
re Phantom power
thanks for the replies guys... i have a berringer field mixer with phantom power... but i am getting sick of having to cart it around with me all the time. Too many leads and things to set up... was just looking for an easy alternative.
|
August 30th, 2002, 09:33 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 107
|
Murray:
Oops, sorry, made a boo-boo then! :-) Suggested the field mixer 'cause most sound recordists I know prefer one...most of the camcorders (and especially the prosumer ones) have the sudio VUs at such inconveneient places, especially when handheld. But I take your commentabout the weight and cables on board...I couldn't agree with you more! Ram |
August 30th, 2002, 09:36 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 107
|
Correction: That should read 'audio VUs' for 'sudio VUs'!
Ooh, my CT syndrome'd fingers! If only this list wasn't so much damned fun! :-) Ram |
August 31st, 2002, 04:13 PM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
WARNING: Professional Line level audio (e.g., +4 dBU) is too hot for the MA-100.
Set or pad your mixer output to -30 dBV and use the MIC ATT setting. |
August 31st, 2002, 06:50 PM | #9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne AUST
Posts: 12
|
thanks for the tip don
|
August 31st, 2002, 10:26 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 107
|
Don: Is the same thing true for the MA-200?
Best, Ram |
September 1st, 2002, 07:18 AM | #11 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
I've not use the MA-200 so I do not know for sure, but my guess would be that Canon use the same or similar internal crcuits in which case it would be true.
A quick analysis (actual figures may be different). The power supply is 5 volts. Allow about 1 power-supply volt for circuit overhead. The MA100 has about 6 dB of gain. That limits the max allowable peak-to-peak excersion of the input signal to about 2 volts before hard clipping which is about -3 dBV. |
| ||||||
|
|