February 6th, 2002, 04:20 PM | #16 |
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Ken, Chris, Adam, and Joe for your help.
Best, Kat |
February 20th, 2002, 09:52 AM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brunn am Gebirge, Austria
Posts: 161
|
Image: 16x manual vs 3x wideangle
Does anybody use both, the new 16x manual lens and the 3x wideangle lens?
Can you tell a difference in the image? The auto-lenses (16x, 3x)are both a little soft. How about the manul lens?
__________________
Peter Koller Vienna, Austria http://www.kop11.com |
February 20th, 2002, 09:47 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 540
|
Peter--
Read the string titled 16X Manual lens started by donbarzini a few days ago-- it might answer your questions. There was mention of both lenses in the string.
__________________
-- Vic Owen -- |
March 11th, 2002, 05:04 AM | #19 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5
|
Canon 3X wide angle lens...need info!
I'm new to working with the Canon XL1s camera and equipment so, I'm in the learning stage. My question: I could purchase a used wide angle lens and save money, or get a new one. Would rather save $$$ and get everything used. Any difference at all in the lens. Thanks!!!
|
March 11th, 2002, 05:56 AM | #20 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 2,882
|
Hi Daniel,
If I understand you correctly, you're wondering if there have been significant changes in the Canon 3X lens in recent years? Not to my knowledge. As far as I know, it's been the same lens from day one...but I can't say for 100% certain. Hopefully, one of the others will jump in here and confirm whether that's correct. As far as buying used equipment goes, the best thing to do is pop a tape in and try it out. Even better, hook it up to a television, if possible, since that will give you a much clearer image to judge. And be sure to try out everything you possibly can...audio inputs, gain, the works. And as far as the 3X lens is concerned, if everything feels snug, and there are no scratches on the front or rear lenses, and the image is fine...go for it. |
March 11th, 2002, 05:54 PM | #21 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5
|
John, thanks for your imput. Your information confirms what I was feeling. Hopefully I'll be able to get more of a confirmation by someone else reading my questions. Hey...have a good move, and thanks again.
|
March 17th, 2002, 10:45 AM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
If you need a wide angle, everyone who has purchased a 3X loves it. Me TOO!
Q) Why would someone sell a used 3X? A) Either they dumped their whole XL1 rig or it is damaged. I'd go with new unless you can carefully examine and try it out first.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
March 17th, 2002, 11:44 PM | #23 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
I'd be inclined to agree with Jacques. Since there is no substitute for the 3x wide lens the only situation under which I could imagine finding a used lens is if someone was liquidating their whole kit. (You could only pry mine from my cold, dead hand <g>.)
I certainly understand wanting to save money but unless you know the seller and the lens I'd just get a new one and get the full warranty period from Canon.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
March 18th, 2002, 04:20 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 355
|
We've been using the 3x in tandem with the 16x for the last week. Compared to the 16x, the 3x is MUCH sharper and brighter. Yesterday we were able to borrow a second 16x from a friend for the duration of the shoot. We found the discrepancy in the sharpness and brightness of the two lenses to be too great.
The 3x is a great lens. My only picky gripe is I wish it were a little longer, say a 4x or 5x. The 3x can't be beat as a wide angle but it's too limited to get a closeup unless you're practically on top of your subject in which case, if it's a person, any forward movement tends to distort. It would be great to be able to zoom from a wide 3 shot to a tight closeup. With the 3x, if you're on a 3 shot and try to zoom in for the close up the best you can expect is an MCU. |
April 26th, 2002, 07:40 AM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brunn am Gebirge, Austria
Posts: 161
|
Push me!
Okay, guys!
Convince me. I am almost ready to spend the $1200 for the wide-angle-lens. Just need a few punches and pushes to really DO it. I wanna buy it. Tell me how good it is! Tell me it is all I ever needed! Make me believe there is no better way to spend all that money! the consume-hungry Peter :-))
__________________
Peter Koller Vienna, Austria http://www.kop11.com |
April 26th, 2002, 08:55 AM | #26 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
OK Peter, here goes.
If you find yourself back inthe snow shooting some snowboarding, the 3x lens is fantastic for getting close to all the big air and halfpipe action. For me that all the pushing I'd need, it's definately on my list.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
April 26th, 2002, 09:10 AM | #27 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
When shooting close-up interviews, the 3x lens will improve your audio. You can get closer to your subject with this lens, which gets the on-board mic closer, improving your audio.
|
April 28th, 2002, 12:02 PM | #28 |
Quantum Productions
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Posts: 161
|
I do weddings and switch back and forth all day between the 3x & 16x lens. The 3x is excellent for landscape shots to a small room with no where to move. The other great thing is that it is a working zoom lens so there is room to zoom in and out a bit! (not like an attatchment wide angle which you can't zoom through).
Get it! You won't be sorry!
__________________
Adam Wakely, Quantum Productions |
April 29th, 2002, 04:05 PM | #29 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
One plus with a zoom-thorugh close-up adapter you spend less time swapping lenses between the 3x and 16x because you effectively get a 16x range that just wider (not as telephoto).
|
April 30th, 2002, 03:33 AM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brunn am Gebirge, Austria
Posts: 161
|
I did it. I did it. Itīs on the way to me. Oh, my god how am I gonna live until it arrives.....? :-)))
Thanks for the pushing, guys! Cheers,
__________________
Peter Koller Vienna, Austria http://www.kop11.com |
| ||||||
|
|