August 18th, 2002, 08:03 PM | #106 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,892
|
XL-1 focusing issues - which one?
Dave,
Howdy. No, you're not alone. I use four XL-1's all bought at the same time and, you guessed it, every damn one of them will not hold a focus from a tight to a wide after a tight manual focus. Occasionally with AF you can get an uninterrupted focus with a slow zoom in or out. From what I have read and heard from other users, it's caused by these servo lenses and really the only way to go for reliable critical focus is the manual lenses. The only very simple work around that I have found that works is to either push to focus and release or use AF until you have settled and then lock it by switching to manual. As far as focus drifting described by another poster, it happened to me a while back once in an interview situation.......once! I was using AF and not paying attention and the subject was soft enough to notice the whole time and the background and its activity was just so nice and clear, you can just imagine the feeling when reviewing the footage. Luckily, documentary shooting has some tolerances. This was an interview with the subject screen left or right. Apparently, the lens focuses on the center of the screen at all times. So the beam shoots right past the subject if framing is set left or right of center. A recommended fix is to set your framing with the subject CENTERED, manually or AF until you know that it's sharp, leave it on manual and then pan left or right to compose the offset interview. If you don't leave it on manual, then any activity or static, dominant source in the background will cause the focus to search and give the camera away, at least the fact that you're using one with AF, not a good feeling, especially when you're telling the producers that you were using Betacam. Ha! From what I've read, heard and occasionally experienced about AF is that it searches for dominant fields to adjust to and goes into overdrive with a solid, neutral background. Just wait and see how fun it is to shoot through thick limbs and leaves with that good ole AF. Hope this helps. |
September 27th, 2002, 01:46 PM | #107 |
Posts: n/a
|
Heard a lot of negative reviews on focus problems with XL1s
Can someone tell me if this is a common flaw of the cameras? Have they been fixed in the newer models?
Im very close to getting one, but the biggest complaint I have heard have been focusing problems. |
September 27th, 2002, 01:56 PM | #108 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
See http://www.dvinfo.net/xl1faq.htm
|
September 27th, 2002, 06:37 PM | #109 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 182
|
Don't think I've used AF for much of anything. I'm a fan of the "push AF" button. Since I still use manual focus 35mm cameras, I found it helpful. I suppose if I were used to auto everything, I wouldn't have bought the xl1S.
__________________
< >< . . . . . < >< . . . . . < >< |
September 27th, 2002, 07:52 PM | #110 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Tickfaw, LA
Posts: 1,217
|
Read the link Chris has provided. This has been over the years an item of considerable debate. I have never had the problem with my XL-1.
__________________
Nathan Gifford Southern Cyclist Magazine & Productions For quick answers try our Search! To see me and Rob Lohman click here |
September 27th, 2002, 10:00 PM | #111 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,054
|
The biggest complaints are regarding auto focus.
I keep mine turned off and that avoids the problem entirely.
__________________
Dean Sensui Exec Producer, Hawaii Goes Fishing |
October 9th, 2002, 07:36 PM | #112 |
Machinist Mate
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 644
|
Exactamundo, Sensui, leave the AF off and it won't hunt around, which is the biggest source of complaints about focus--it's all about the lens not being able to decide which point to focus on when objects are at different distances. Like 1 Jophoto, I like the "push AF" button.
__________________
I ain't straight outta Compton, I'm straight out the trailer. Cuss like a sailor, drink like a Mc. My only words of wisdom are just, "Radio Edit." |
October 9th, 2002, 08:42 PM | #113 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lousana, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 146
|
I use the push AF quite a bit - probably too much. I would prefer to manually focus more, but due to the shortcomings of the stock EVF (poor resolution), I find I'm not always confident that the focus is right on. I am getting more used to the EVF, but I would like to try the optional B&W one or an external LCD like the one described in Chris' article on the five best accessories. Beautiful "in focus" shots are the norm for the XL1s, but being confident that my shots are OK is not. I usually am a bit anxious until I get home and view my days work on a monitor. I also recommend experimenting with the camera hooked up to a monitor once in a while. I should mention that almost all of my work is outdoors-run and gun stuff.
__________________
Nature Boy |
January 13th, 2003, 07:57 PM | #114 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 51
|
XL-1 focus problem
I don't know if this is a back focus problem like I see others getting succesfully fixed by Canon or not. My lens problem is when the lens is at the widest setting the focus seems to just drift whenever it feels like it. I have to keep pushing the autofocus button every 5 seconds to get it back in focus. This all occurs when I'm in the "A" setting and the lens is set to manual focus. I've tried zooming in on a distant object focusing sharp then backing up and zooming in again the object is still in focus. It just seems like the autofocus is never turned off even though I'm 100% sure that it is. Is this a Canon fix or do I have to keep spending money for Canon's add ons ie 16x manual lens to fix problems they engineered into their products?
|
January 13th, 2003, 08:25 PM | #115 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Your desciption does not sound like a back-focus problem. (That's where the lens does not hold focus on an object as you zoom in and out.) Rather, it sounds like your autofocus is a bit flakey and, as you speculate, may not be disengaging when you switch to Manual Focus.
No big ideas here, just a wild shot. If you've not already tried this, you might try removeing the lens and re-mounting it. The lens and body communicate through a series of contacts that are seated when the lens is squarely mounted. Maybe something's flakey there. Otherwise that will definitely be a Canon repair.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
February 4th, 2003, 03:55 PM | #116 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 24
|
I've noticed a similair to the effect you are experiencing when my XL1s is in the (M)anual mode. Although I don't get the wide angle drift the XL1s seemed incapable of holding focus when zooming in and out. At first I though that I had a back focus problem.
Strangely, setting the gain control to +0dB (or whatever) rather than (A)uto completely eliminates this problem. I've tested this several times. The last time being 5 minutes before making this post. I know that this isn't quite your problem but try it out - you never know. Sorry if that was of no help at all! |
February 4th, 2003, 06:24 PM | #117 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 51
|
James,
Thanks I'll give it a try. I've never tried this method. Johnathan |
February 4th, 2003, 09:16 PM | #118 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
Hmmmm. Zoming when in auto gain mode may canse hot spots to move through the metering zones and cause changes in expsoure. And similarly, an area that is poor for autofocus (no contrast) may move through the AF sensor sampling zone. Also, auto focus needs some light, about 50 lux, to work well.
|
February 12th, 2003, 09:06 PM | #119 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 51
|
What?
|
February 13th, 2003, 05:48 AM | #120 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
The point being that during zooming (or during action in the iscene) the image presented to the various automatic-mode sensors is changing, and these changes could induce unwanted changes in aperture, shutter speed, gain, and focus.
Also changing aperture may change apparent focus of items inthe scene as thedepth of field changes. (Also, I cleaned up some typos in the earlier post) |
| ||||||
|
|