|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 3rd, 2002, 11:58 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newport Beach California
Posts: 21
|
Quality of XL1s still image
Few questions here:
1) How would the quality of the XL1s compare to an image from an Olympus DIgi camera at shq? Will the lense make it sooo much better w/ the xl1s? 2) What is the best means to capture image? I have onboard firwire port and I use Vegas Video 3.0 for editing. 3) Is there a way to capture strait into Adobe 7.0 on pc format? Thank you o digi community. |
August 3rd, 2002, 01:19 PM | #2 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The Olympus probably has the better image quality. Which model is it? The lens has a great deal to do with image quality but it can't over come resolution that may be 2 or 3 times the resolution of the XL1s. The SHQ mode will be either JPEG or TIFF depending on how the camera is set up. Photoshop has no problem reading either a TIFF or JPEG.
Jeff |
August 3rd, 2002, 01:46 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newport Beach California
Posts: 21
|
Olympus C-2500L
Question 1 and 2 in my original post pertained if xl1s was higher quality. I use the san disk reader to bring in my images from Olympus thank you JT |
August 3rd, 2002, 03:34 PM | #4 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The C2500L is a 2.5 million, 2/3 inch CCD and will produce a higher quality image than the XL1s. The SHQ mode will produce photo quality images of at least 5x7" and perhaps larger depending on the printer, paper, inks, image processing etc.
Jeff |
August 3rd, 2002, 08:27 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newport Beach California
Posts: 21
|
Thank you Jeff
|
| ||||||
|
|