Canon 28-135mm IS USM is perfect! at DVinfo.net

Ron Transco · July 19th, 2002, 04:26 PM

I just bought the Canon 28-135mm lens for use on my XL1s. For those of you not familiar with the lens, it has a stationary front element (great for polarizers), a fantastic Image Stabilizer, and uses the same size filters as the stock lens. I bought it primarily for macro use (3/4" fills the frame at 9" from the front element), but it turns out to out perform the stock lens by a long shot. First I can handhold it through out the zoom range, which is 200mm to 972mm on the XL1s. Secondly the manual focus is much better than on the stock lens. I could focus on my cat's whiskers from 30 feet away. I also noticed that the colors seem more vivid with virtually no bleed. I thought it was impossible to get a sharp focus with the CVF, but with this lens everything I've done so far is right on, even when viewed on a 63 wide screen monitor!

Jeff Donald · July 19th, 2002, 05:30 PM

It is a very fine lens. Canon did a great job on it. If you end up needing something longer try out the Canon EOS EF 70 - 300mm IS lens. It complements the 28 - 135mm nicely. It's filter size is smaller, but optically they match real well. Enjoy, and have fun shooting.

Jeff

Ron Transco · July 19th, 2002, 09:18 PM

Jeff -

The 70-300mm is the next thing on my wish list. With the 3 lenses I should be set for anything that comes along.

Dylan Couper · July 20th, 2002, 12:04 AM

How much was it?

This is with the lens adapter, right? We aren't talking about one that mounts right to the xl1.

Ron Transco · July 20th, 2002, 09:12 AM

Yes, this lens requires the lens adapter. I paid $419.95 for the lens and $439.95 for the EF adapter at B&H. Canon has a $10.00 rebate on the lens. B&H also sells a gray market lens for less money, but without warranty. If I had shopped around more I probably could have found a better price, but B&H is a good outfit to deal with. I buy most of my gear through them or ZGC.

Nathan Gifford · July 20th, 2002, 03:59 PM

It has a stabilizer too? How wide is it? Might be nice to see a few pictures.

Do you have a URL for the lens?

Nathan Gifford

Ron Transco · July 20th, 2002, 04:07 PM

Here is the link for the lens:

http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/lineup/standard/index.html

You'll find the picture, dimensions, etc. there. Yes the lens has an image stabilizer and it's excellent. With a little care I was able to shoot at full zoom (972mm) handheld. The camera plus lens is so heavy I wouldn't be able to do it for very long, but good for those quick shots when you don't have time to setup.

Jacques Mersereau · July 21st, 2002, 11:04 AM

If your XL1 is getting too heavy, and you don't have a lot of money for a steadicam, you should check into The MARzPAK™ handheld camera support system. About $400 plus some shipping. All you
do it put it on like a backpack, clip in the camera and go. The russian tank of handheld support.

I don't even try to shoot without mine now, and
when I do, I wonder how I ever got through a shoot.

*ALERT* I am the co inventor of this device,
but I stand behind what I claim.

You can see some stuff about it on Mr. Hurd's Watchdog or go to www.marztech.com for lots of info and details.

Thanks for the report on this lens, I will have to afford it now. It is amazing the quality jump when using better glass! The color is way better, the images sharper, and getting focus is SOOO easy.

July 19th, 2002, 04:26 PM	#1
Ron Transco Regular Crew Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 53	Canon 28-135mm IS USM is perfect! I just bought the Canon 28-135mm lens for use on my XL1s. For those of you not familiar with the lens, it has a stationary front element (great for polarizers), a fantastic Image Stabilizer, and uses the same size filters as the stock lens. I bought it primarily for macro use (3/4" fills the frame at 9" from the front element), but it turns out to out perform the stock lens by a long shot. First I can handhold it through out the zoom range, which is 200mm to 972mm on the XL1s. Secondly the manual focus is much better than on the stock lens. I could focus on my cat's whiskers from 30 feet away. I also noticed that the colors seem more vivid with virtually no bleed. I thought it was impossible to get a sharp focus with the CVF, but with this lens everything I've done so far is right on, even when viewed on a 63 wide screen monitor! __________________ Ron

July 19th, 2002, 09:18 PM	#3
Ron Transco Regular Crew Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 53	Jeff - The 70-300mm is the next thing on my wish list. With the 3 lenses I should be set for anything that comes along. __________________ Ron

July 20th, 2002, 09:12 AM	#5
Ron Transco Regular Crew Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 53	Yes, this lens requires the lens adapter. I paid $419.95 for the lens and $439.95 for the EF adapter at B&H. Canon has a $10.00 rebate on the lens. B&H also sells a gray market lens for less money, but without warranty. If I had shopped around more I probably could have found a better price, but B&H is a good outfit to deal with. I buy most of my gear through them or ZGC. __________________ Ron

July 20th, 2002, 04:07 PM	#7
Ron Transco Regular Crew Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 53	Here is the link for the lens: http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/lineup/standard/index.html You'll find the picture, dimensions, etc. there. Yes the lens has an image stabilizer and it's excellent. With a little care I was able to shoot at full zoom (972mm) handheld. The camera plus lens is so heavy I wouldn't be able to do it for very long, but good for those quick shots when you don't have time to setup. __________________ Ron

July 21st, 2002, 11:04 AM	#8
Jacques Mersereau Trustee Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 1,334	If your XL1 is getting too heavy, and you don't have a lot of money for a steadicam, you should check into The MARzPAK™ handheld camera support system. About $400 plus some shipping. All you do it put it on like a backpack, clip in the camera and go. The russian tank of handheld support. I don't even try to shoot without mine now, and when I do, I wonder how I ever got through a shoot. ALERT I am the co inventor of this device, but I stand behind what I claim. You can see some stuff about it on Mr. Hurd's Watchdog or go to www.marztech.com for lots of info and details. Thanks for the report on this lens, I will have to afford it now. It is amazing the quality jump when using better glass! The color is way better, the images sharper, and getting focus is SOOO easy. __________________ Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager

July 19th, 2002, 05:30 PM	#2
Jeff Donald Warden Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Clearwater, FL Posts: 8,287	It is a very fine lens. Canon did a great job on it. If you end up needing something longer try out the Canon EOS EF 70 - 300mm IS lens. It complements the 28 - 135mm nicely. It's filter size is smaller, but optically they match real well. Enjoy, and have fun shooting. Jeff

July 20th, 2002, 12:04 AM	#4
Dylan Couper Wrangler Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia Posts: 8,314	How much was it? This is with the lens adapter, right? We aren't talking about one that mounts right to the xl1.

July 20th, 2002, 03:59 PM	#6
Nathan Gifford Wrangler Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Tickfaw, LA Posts: 1,217	It has a stabilizer too? How wide is it? Might be nice to see a few pictures. Do you have a URL for the lens? Nathan Gifford