|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 18th, 2002, 12:08 PM | #16 |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
The star trails aren't necessary but I can see how they can be done in Premiere. I'm more after the "Baraka" look where the landscape stays still but you can see the stars movement in the background.
|
July 18th, 2002, 12:38 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 220
|
Hi,
to achieve your goal you would be best off by getting hold of a 8" or larger Newtonian telescope and rigging the XL-1 to the eyepiece holder (not an easy task). Then point the scope at the horizon and don't touch a thing. I know the Pinnacle DV300 had a time lapse function that would allow the use of a 1 hour tape rather than 8 hours...there must be other products around. I have seen excellent planetary images captured through a 10" Meade scope mounted on a motorised equatorial mount (allows for the tracking of a celestial object) and the XL-1. A smaller DV cam would be a lot easier. The larger the scope the more light gathering power and hence the brighter the image. Full moon through a 8" Newtonian can be uncomfotable bright for the eyes. Scopes are also like lenses and are rated by F stop. The one I built was an F8 1825mm focul length. When you get a decent F4 man the stuff you see is so bright. Go find some scope sights. Cheers Andrew
__________________
PAL XL-1, DV Raptor, Premiere TOTAL AMATEUR - DOING IT FOR THE FUN |
July 18th, 2002, 12:48 PM | #18 |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
Whoah. That's a lot of gear.
Perhaps I should try to contact my local stargazers club to see if they can assist... |
July 18th, 2002, 12:52 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 220
|
Now ya talking,
Generaly stargazers are nutters..(don't tell them that). Seriously have have a passion for their craft and I would not be surprised if some are nor already rigged for your requirement. Some will definitely be rigged for 35mm stills. Good thinking Cheers Andrew
__________________
PAL XL-1, DV Raptor, Premiere TOTAL AMATEUR - DOING IT FOR THE FUN |
July 18th, 2002, 03:16 PM | #20 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
It might be cheaper and easier to just get a particle filter / plug-in for your NLE and just fake it. <g>
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
July 18th, 2002, 03:18 PM | #21 |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
Well yeah I could do it in Maya too but that's not really the point. :) I want to get the true star movements from a certain point in Vancouver. :)
Anyway, I've already got an idea who to hook up with. He is a REAL stargazer enthusiast who actually sells all kinds of telescopes including the Newtonian one that was mentioned upthread. |
July 18th, 2002, 03:30 PM | #22 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Well, if you insist on doing it the hard way, Keith... <g>
Sky & Telescope Magazine has a section of tips that might lead you to good stuff. http://skyandtelescope.com/howto/imaging/default.asp
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
| ||||||
|
|