|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 18th, 2007, 04:48 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 16
|
JVC's 35mm adapter...We need a Canon equivalent
JVC just came out with a 35mm adapter for the GY series:
http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/f...l_id=MDL101683 Compact form, less than a stop of light loss, list price of 4395.00... Could we see Canon come up with something similiar, unlocking that until-now dormant flip feature? I know the new P+S compact item is coming, but I'm really liking the small-form of this JVC number. I'd love to see something similiar from Canon Last edited by James Swirsky; June 18th, 2007 at 08:34 PM. |
June 18th, 2007, 06:19 PM | #2 |
Starway Pictures
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Studio City
Posts: 581
|
And could Canon please build it for considerably less than $5000! Shnikies!
|
June 18th, 2007, 06:24 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: glassboro, NJ
Posts: 87
|
THIS THING ONLY LOSSES 0.5F. i WANT TO SEE SOME FOOTAGE.
|
June 18th, 2007, 10:01 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,427
|
I started tearing apart an ef adapter with hope's of making use of the flip function, don't know which contact to tape down though. but honestly this looks really similar to the 35c which I think may actually have an even smaller form factor then this jvc one. Maybe they'll both be at cine-gear and someone can compare the two.
__________________
I have a dream that one day canon will release a 35mm ef to xl adapter and I'll have iris control and a 35mm dof of all my ef lenses, and it will be awesome... |
June 20th, 2007, 04:08 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 470
|
That's quite exciting, 16mm or 35mm DOF from an adapter designed specifically for the camera. Just a shame it's such a high proportion of the price of the camera itself, once you add the cost of a PL mount lens or two, you're going to be right up there with an hpx500, basic SI-2K etc. and you're still stuck with 1/3" sensors.
Still I shouldn't complain - it's a step in the right direction, and that's always a good thing! |
| ||||||
|
|