|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 6th, 2006, 08:54 AM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
Quote:
|
|
July 6th, 2006, 01:09 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 306
|
Maybe off-topic, but do you guys know if it's possible to export tiff-sequenses from FCP5?
__________________
Jonas Nyström, DoP :: HOT SHOT® SWEDEN :: www.hotshot.nu :: RED #1567, RED 18-50mm T3 :: XL A1, Letus Extreme :: XL H1, 20X & 6X lens (for sale) :: www.vimeo.com/nystrom Last edited by Jonas Nystrom; July 6th, 2006 at 03:23 PM. |
July 6th, 2006, 03:24 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 306
|
Still progressive?
I've found the answer, for my question (File > Export > QT Converstion > Image Sequence > Options > TIFF, 25fps, Best Depth (Compression: None), size 1920x1080, 72dpi, rgb, 8bit).
Will I still have it as progressive if captured after your recomendations, Barlow?
__________________
Jonas Nyström, DoP :: HOT SHOT® SWEDEN :: www.hotshot.nu :: RED #1567, RED 18-50mm T3 :: XL A1, Letus Extreme :: XL H1, 20X & 6X lens (for sale) :: www.vimeo.com/nystrom |
July 6th, 2006, 03:26 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
Quote:
|
|
July 6th, 2006, 03:47 PM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 306
|
Yeah it is (25fps). I've captured through HDVxDV and exported in Streamclip to DVCproHD or JPEG (not decided yet). Really nice footage! Only problem; disc space. How large files should it be? For example; 100% quality in DVCproHD, size 1920x1080 what should it end up in per minute?
__________________
Jonas Nyström, DoP :: HOT SHOT® SWEDEN :: www.hotshot.nu :: RED #1567, RED 18-50mm T3 :: XL A1, Letus Extreme :: XL H1, 20X & 6X lens (for sale) :: www.vimeo.com/nystrom |
July 6th, 2006, 04:10 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
A little less than 1 GB per min.
|
July 6th, 2006, 11:52 PM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
quick fix for the screen direction problem at 24 secs...flip that shot horizontally...that'll put her on the correct side of the screen...no finessing needed. Since there's no text in the scene to show you've done so, this shoudl work just fine. Nice piece...can't wait to see the finished project.
|
July 7th, 2006, 09:49 AM | #23 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 3
|
Impressive... I was looking for some film footage and here it is. Very stunning, that makes me want to save money (which would be useless anyway for now...).
Bravo! |
July 7th, 2006, 02:42 PM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
and now that I look at it again, a cutaway would work better than flipping as flipping would feel just as weird since we are looking at their backs in the second.
|
July 22nd, 2006, 03:33 PM | #25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Luis Obispo CA
Posts: 1,195
|
Robert-
I have to ask, as your footage doesn't seem to have what I would consider as one of the signature picture elements of this camera, that being significant visible Chromatic abberation or color fringing and softness specifically as you get further from the center of the frame. Virtually every clip I've seen, except yours, shows this issue pretty quickly. Your footage appears remarkably sharp and clean in neutral contrast areas right out to the edge of the frame, there are a few high contrast areas that show the CA, but again at a level that is quite below other clips. I've played with XLH1 only once, and I saw the problem immediately. Can you explain what is going on? Do you know what F-stops were used in this clip? Is there some magic CA correcting software I'm unaware of? Did you just get a lucky camera? Sorry to harass. I've recently come into a chunk of cash allowing me to go HD, and this one issue has bugged me from the beginning about this camera, your footage has given me hope. Any thoughts would be appreciated. (BTW...fabulous work..inspirational to see this quality of a project being done on this camera by a member of our boards. Barry |
July 23rd, 2006, 10:44 PM | #26 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
So what does that mean, u shot in 24f which i get (did you use any kind of lense)? Also impored the footage (im guessing to FCP or AVID or Premier) and converted to DVCProHD? What is that? and how do you do that with what program and what is the benefit of it? Does it change your footage to HD? is that even possible? Great job and i bookmarked your site.. well done... Joey Dee
__________________
PumaTalk.com - Talk about your PUMA kicks & PUMA gear. |
|
July 28th, 2006, 03:03 AM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Berkeley, Ca
Posts: 75
|
I'm also extremely impressed. I think when the XH A1 comes out, I'm going to splurge and get it. It unfortunately won't have the viability of lenses that the H1 has, but with the looks of 24f, and the same core imaging system, it should be one hell of a camera for the price!
Thanks for the post!
__________________
The tall unorthodox Asian Tackling life one day at a time. Camera: Canon XH A1 (once it's out!!) Lens: Canon FD 50mm f/1.4, 35mm-70mm f/2.8-3.5, 70mm-140mm f/3.8 Adapter: Micro35 DIY *Ghetto style!* |
July 28th, 2006, 01:38 PM | #28 | |
Starway Pictures
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Studio City
Posts: 581
|
Quote:
I personally think the CA issue wrt to the stock 20x lens is a little out of proportion with reality. I don't think we did anything special with the shoot. We did use a lot of neutral density filters to control the amount of light entering the lens. This allowed us to open the iris as much as possible so that we could get a shallower depth-of-field and additional shadow detail. Also, keep in mind that there are three shots in that clip that used the Canon 3x SD lens. Remember, this is the same lens everyone said was useless on the H1. We made a custom preset specifically for that lens with detail turned up slightly to compensate for the lens' inherent softness. We are looking forward to buying the new Canon 6x lens once it's available. Same wide angle field of view as the 3x but with the same sharpness as the 20x. It will make a great addition to our set of lenses (20x, 16x SD manual, 3x). I did not use any software to fix CA. However, there is a FCP plugin from River Rock Studios called "Bad Lens" that can help fixing agregious problems. But I haven't applied to any shots in my project so far. |
|
July 28th, 2006, 01:46 PM | #29 | |
Starway Pictures
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Studio City
Posts: 581
|
Quote:
The whole project was shot 1080 24f(p). |
|
July 28th, 2006, 01:48 PM | #30 | |
Starway Pictures
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Studio City
Posts: 581
|
Quote:
I'm sure the G1 and A1 are equally impressive. |
|
| ||||||
|
|