|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 1st, 2006, 02:10 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 104
|
Marshall 7" issues
I just got off the phone with Marshall Eletronics. The V-R70P-HDA monitor, that I purchased to work with my XL H1 cannot display the correct pixel aspect ration from the HD composite (D) jack, and it doesn't accept the HD-SDI signal.
It does display a very nice high resolution image, but the HDA monitor cannot correct for the 1.33 pixel aspect ratio. The more expensive Marshall V-R70P-HDSDI will accept the HD-SDI signal and correctly display the image. I was shooting an interview last week and noticed that the persons head was way too wide on the Marshall. I'm trying to work out an exchange with Marshall. If you are going to purchase a Marshall, purchase the HDSDI model! |
May 1st, 2006, 11:06 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 658
|
Barry, Thanks,
I am tryingg to work out how much I need one. It seems crutial for perfect focus (esp with a 35mm adapter) How good does it appear to be for the super fine adjustments in manual focus. Give us a review when you get it |
May 2nd, 2006, 03:57 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 42
|
Dam* it. I just got the V-R70P-HDA.
Hmm... Barry, given that you stated that it works good three weeks ago, how annoying is the aspect ration thing on location? (I haven't got the XLH1 yet) If you just noticed it, it cannot be to much of an issue, right? Are there any parts of the image missing on screen? Are there black bars top/bottom? "the persons head was way too wide". Strange, I would have assumed that the image is rather compressed horizontally than expanded, since it is missing the 1.33 pixel aspect ratio, displaying the 1440x1080 instead of scaling it to 1920x1080 - and then down-rez it to 800x450. Thanks, Jack |
May 2nd, 2006, 11:14 AM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 104
|
Quote:
Shooting a CD as a round subject, very square to camera. Even the EVF doesn't display a round image. I'm getting a 94.5 percent oval in both the EVF and in the Marshall. Is my H1 in error? Anybody else? Barry |
|
May 2nd, 2006, 06:28 PM | #5 |
Starway Pictures
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Studio City
Posts: 581
|
$2000! Ouch!!!!
|
May 2nd, 2006, 07:52 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
Best, Christopher |
|
May 3rd, 2006, 12:12 AM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Strange, the component out on my H1 is 1920x1080.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
May 3rd, 2006, 12:14 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 104
|
I really think this may be a problem with my camera. I spoke to Canon Service yesterday and they say they have never heard of the problem. Both the Marshall and my EVF are showing the same stretching of the image. Canon wants me to send in the camera, lens and EVF for service.
Is anyone else seeing a stretching of the image in their EVF? Thanks, Barry |
May 3rd, 2006, 03:31 PM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,267
|
Barry,
Do you have any other monitors in house you can look at to see if the output of the camera is stretched somehow? Canon probably doesn't know what you are talking about so you might want to record it on tape and send them the tape first. They at least should give you a loaner if you have to send the camera in. |
May 3rd, 2006, 05:01 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 104
|
I took a digital still image of the EVF and sent that with the camera to Canon. My dealer has agreed to provide a loaner camera if I need one.
The image is stretched on the EVF and the Marshall. However when I send the signal to my Panasonic 17 inch, it is just fine. It makes no sense to me. Thanks, Barry |
| ||||||
|
|