|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 15th, 2006, 10:16 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
I've been able to capture timecode with a LANC to RS422 adapter, and it controls the H1 too, but batch capture is dicey so it's only of benefit for future redigitizing if necessary when the camera is properly supported.
Sometimes I wish I wasn't so heavily invested in FCP. The Cineform option is looking better all the time. |
April 15th, 2006, 10:43 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 389
|
I'm wondering with the new Macpro's or whatever the new laptops are called... if you could bring it in as a cineform codec and then somehow they make it work with FCP...
Just some wishes... |
April 16th, 2006, 09:21 AM | #18 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
Mac Book Pro (all intel macs) probably could work Premiere Pro and Cineform under the Bootcamp. What do you think? |
|
April 16th, 2006, 12:38 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: venice, ca
Posts: 83
|
Personally, they should not be advertising hdv support if they only support one company. sony.
|
April 16th, 2006, 02:05 PM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
Quote:
|
|
April 16th, 2006, 10:03 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: venice, ca
Posts: 83
|
I think it will be a life save if it proves supported and stable.
Personally I'm probably one of the few who loves windows and most windows software but today not only do you really need apple for some things, it's stable. I've had so many pc's especially the laptops that were either a complete waste of money or needed continual tech support. Since I swithed to apple I havn't had these issue. Also PC's do support things quicker. I really hope mactel is the answer and does not turn out to be a disappointment for both traditional pc and apple people. |
May 24th, 2006, 11:08 AM | #22 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
I'm currently trying to decide between the HVX and H1 for shooting motorcycle races. The HVX at 720p60 seems the logical choice but I think the P2 workflow is going to be more of a hassle than it's worth at this point, at least until large capacity cards become available. The H1 looks like an excellent option as well but I'm concerned about HDV's ability to handle panning with brightly colored bikes moving at ~200mph. I've got an HC1 which I'm just shooting casually with but I've noticed a lot of compression artifacts when creating slow motion footage from it.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
May 24th, 2006, 12:47 PM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
i'm in the same situation, but with 200 mph cars instead of bikes, among other things.
the h1 is the only prosumer hd camera with enough glass to do the job for me, so it's not a question of the competition, but rather, what are the options for a portable video recorder with an sdi input? i believe that century performance is coming out with a lens extender for the front of the camera? i think that the only thing canon has is the 1.6 extender from the xl1-xl2 series of cameras. |
| ||||||
|
|