|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
Canon, in all likelihood, felt comfortable in calling the H1's SD 24F "progressive" because there's literally enough resolution in the chip to derive a progressive SD frame from a field of HD.
How else could you get NTSC progressive from a 1080i chip? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|