|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 4th, 2006, 01:56 PM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
|
|
March 5th, 2006, 12:15 AM | #17 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
March 5th, 2006, 02:26 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 945
|
Canon, in all likelihood, felt comfortable in calling the H1's SD 24F "progressive" because there's literally enough resolution in the chip to derive a progressive SD frame from a field of HD.
How else could you get NTSC progressive from a 1080i chip? |
| ||||||
|
|