options for capturing HD-SDI output at DVinfo.net

John Cordell · February 2nd, 2006, 11:27 AM

Does anybody have suggestions for mid-to-low cost options for capturing the HD-SDI output of the H1? For those times when I am shooting green-screen, it seems worthwhile to capture the 4:2:2 data stream. I have a quad Mac that I could lug to the shoot if need be. Its drive subsystem can sustain maybe 80MB/sec write, so I'm not asking about capturing uncompressed, I assume that on the fly compression of some type will be involved.

Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. I am deciding between the HVX200 and the H1, and understanding how easily I'll be able to capture the 4:2:2 signal is a factor for me.

thanks.

Shannon Rawls · February 2nd, 2006, 11:44 AM

John,
Why not get an HVX200 and you'll always have 4:2:2 no matter what you do, since that is important to you?

- ShannonRawls.com

John Cordell · February 2nd, 2006, 12:02 PM

I may well end up with the HVX200. Greenscreen work will only be a small percentage of the shooting I do, so it's only one factor in the decision for me.

On the H1, I like the longer lens in that it'll allow me to get shallow depth of field in more situations. I like the higher resolution (I've A/B'ed the two cameras over at Birns and Sawyer). I like the idea of being able to remove the lens. I like the future-proofing that the HD-SDI out provides. I will go tapeless on the H1, so not having P2 doesn't bother me so much.

On the HVX, I like the variable framerates, wider lens, the 100mb/sec native recording format/codec. And the colors and "feel" -- it looks more like film to my eye, but I wonder how much that gap can be closed once the H1 is really set up to look like film.

So, bottom line (for me) is that both appear to be great cameras but I'm not quite sure which is best (for me).

Vince Gaffney · February 2nd, 2006, 12:14 PM

i'm about to use the H1 for a greenscreen job. I'm working in SD but I'm bringing along my panasonic aj sd93 and going to dv50. I'm working on a stage so it's reasonable. even on location the deck could easily be lashed to the dolly. althuogh it's a bit loud for sync.

vince

Vincent Rozenberg · February 2nd, 2006, 04:12 PM

There's a about 500 dollar SDI capture card from BlackMagic design, which works works FCP. Maybe that will suit your demands?

Chet Kenisell · February 12th, 2006, 04:40 PM

What about the Matrox Axio? Not sure how cost effective it is for you, but you could get plenty of hard drive space, with an uncompressed HD NLE for about 30,000 Jr. Bacon Cheeseburgers. The breakout box has HD-SDI in and out I believe.

February 2nd, 2006, 11:27 AM	#1
John Cordell Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 69	options for capturing HD-SDI output Does anybody have suggestions for mid-to-low cost options for capturing the HD-SDI output of the H1? For those times when I am shooting green-screen, it seems worthwhile to capture the 4:2:2 data stream. I have a quad Mac that I could lug to the shoot if need be. Its drive subsystem can sustain maybe 80MB/sec write, so I'm not asking about capturing uncompressed, I assume that on the fly compression of some type will be involved. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. I am deciding between the HVX200 and the H1, and understanding how easily I'll be able to capture the 4:2:2 signal is a factor for me. thanks.

February 2nd, 2006, 11:44 AM	#2
Shannon Rawls Major Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Los Angeles, California Posts: 853	John, Why not get an HVX200 and you'll always have 4:2:2 no matter what you do, since that is important to you? - ShannonRawls.com __________________ Shannon W. Rawls ~ Motion Picture Producer & huge advocate of Digital Acquisition.

February 12th, 2006, 04:40 PM	#6
Chet Kenisell Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Round Rock, TX Posts: 42	What about the Matrox Axio? Not sure how cost effective it is for you, but you could get plenty of hard drive space, with an uncompressed HD NLE for about 30,000 Jr. Bacon Cheeseburgers. The breakout box has HD-SDI in and out I believe. __________________ Chet

February 2nd, 2006, 12:02 PM	#3
John Cordell Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 69	I may well end up with the HVX200. Greenscreen work will only be a small percentage of the shooting I do, so it's only one factor in the decision for me. On the H1, I like the longer lens in that it'll allow me to get shallow depth of field in more situations. I like the higher resolution (I've A/B'ed the two cameras over at Birns and Sawyer). I like the idea of being able to remove the lens. I like the future-proofing that the HD-SDI out provides. I will go tapeless on the H1, so not having P2 doesn't bother me so much. On the HVX, I like the variable framerates, wider lens, the 100mb/sec native recording format/codec. And the colors and "feel" -- it looks more like film to my eye, but I wonder how much that gap can be closed once the H1 is really set up to look like film. So, bottom line (for me) is that both appear to be great cameras but I'm not quite sure which is best (for me).

February 2nd, 2006, 12:14 PM	#4
Vince Gaffney Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 146	i'm about to use the H1 for a greenscreen job. I'm working in SD but I'm bringing along my panasonic aj sd93 and going to dv50. I'm working on a stage so it's reasonable. even on location the deck could easily be lashed to the dolly. althuogh it's a bit loud for sync. vince

February 2nd, 2006, 04:12 PM	#5
Vincent Rozenberg Major Player Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands Posts: 475	There's a about 500 dollar SDI capture card from BlackMagic design, which works works FCP. Maybe that will suit your demands?