|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 23rd, 2005, 07:07 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
24F cadence... any clues?
Given that the 24F is supposed to be better tha the Z1's CF24, how will it be encoded to the 60i stream.
Will there be a 2:3:3:2 cedence in addition to 2:3, or will it be output as a true 24 fps file? I wonder because I got the feeling that the Z1's attempt to do create a 2:3 cadence caused compression artefacts. I got the feeling that jumping between interlaced and un-interlaced frames within a 15 frame GOP pushed the codec a little. Dylan. |
September 23rd, 2005, 07:20 AM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Hi Dylan,
I scrolled through the XL H1 menu options last week pretty thoroughly. Indeed there is an option to select 2:3 or 2:3:3:2 for 24F. Keep in mind those were pre-production MT samples though. |
September 23rd, 2005, 07:35 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
the 2:3:3:2 cadence is good news, though I'm still concerned. I did get the feeling that having one interlaced frame would sort of reverberate through the compression GOP - it seems to on the Z1.
|
September 23rd, 2005, 08:52 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
I've never noticed any obvious compression artifacting in CF24 footage above what I would experience with CF30 or 60i. -Steve |
|
September 23rd, 2005, 10:02 AM | #5 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Yes, I'm surprize the camera offers 2:3:3:2 as is doesn't need it for HDV. Although it may have marketing value as many do assume incorrectly that it will impact compression quality. However 2:3:3:2 will be handle to support the DV mode, which is helped by this field structure.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
| ||||||
|
|