|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 8th, 2005, 03:41 AM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 376
|
James Rhodes
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=52964 |
|
November 9th, 2005, 08:45 AM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
i posted this question on direct to disk forum and no1 seems to know.
has anyone made a record to 3.5" hard drive yet? they have SATA2, 500GB drives =). think about that. just 1 drive can give you 456.25GB or roughly 7 and 1/2 hours of hi-def (based on 1GB=1minute). dunno how that converts into uncompressed 1080i. how much does 1080i take up via SDI? it seems that it's only logical. those firestore solutions only does 80GB.
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 9th, 2005, 10:51 AM | #18 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
uncompressed 1080i HS-SDI = 1920x1080x30(frames)x2(bytes= for 8-bit 4:2:2) = 120MBytes/s, about 3 and 4 times the speed a single drive can sustain. 10-bit uncompressed from HD-SDI is 150MBytes/s. It is for this higher data rates CineForm is working with Wafian to build HDSDI compression solutions -- allowing a 500GB drive to store 7 hours of 10-bit data.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
November 10th, 2005, 09:20 AM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
but a single hard drive can't sustain 150MB/s. only raid0 and a few hard drives will get you that. you're right... this is why no1's made one yet =). very interesting...
thx for clearing that up.
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 10th, 2005, 11:18 AM | #20 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
|
|
November 10th, 2005, 11:57 AM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
how does prospect HD look in quality vs. HDV? i mean if it's roughly the same, HDV takes care of most of those application. the focal point of HD SDI would be uncompressed cap, right?
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 11th, 2005, 08:31 AM | #22 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11th, 2005, 12:23 PM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
meaning less compression artifacts? blocky pixels?
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 15th, 2005, 07:17 AM | #24 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 873
|
Quote:
Well it's a 10bit codec for starters, so better than 8bit DVCProHD and because it's frame based you can edit more simply than HDV native )it's much higher data rate than HDV native). There's a thread in HD100 forum where David Newman CEO of Cineform has chimed in. Looking at their website tests etc it looks a very viable option to uncompressed. |
|
| ||||||
|
|