|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 15th, 2005, 09:51 PM | #16 | |||
Obstreperous Rex
|
Hi Aaron,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
September 15th, 2005, 10:33 PM | #17 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2005, 10:44 PM | #18 |
Wrangler
|
I wonder if Canon will sell the PAL version in Europe and then sell an NTSC upgrade. Hmmm ...
__________________
"Ultimately, the most extraordinary thing, in a frame, is a human being." - Martin Scorsese |
September 15th, 2005, 10:44 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 423
|
It has been stated that the CCD block is interlaced, not progressive, so I don't know why anyone is getting excited about recording 1080p. From an interlaced CCD is can only be an electronic conversion, nothing a NLE can't do from 720p or 1080i etc
The best thing about this camera is the CCD being pretty much native 1440x1080 for its 1080i. This might make sensitivy even more of a problem with this camera though (even smaller pixels than the Z1 and HD100). |
September 15th, 2005, 10:46 PM | #20 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
The 50i/60i conversion is available to both North American and European versions.
|
September 15th, 2005, 10:49 PM | #21 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2005, 10:57 PM | #22 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
is there a way to store it until we can get it to a rental house deck? Eg: I can shoot it in a museum, store the footage in a tape/hdisk, take it to a HD deck rental place - and convert it to whatever format i want? |
|
September 15th, 2005, 11:03 PM | #23 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
You'd be shooting HDV. Not that HDV is all that bad. I saw some beautiful HDV at the Canon Expo, looked absolutely stunning... but the few pans that were in that video were very slow pans. Those are my favorite kind anyway.
|
September 15th, 2005, 11:11 PM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bevery Hills, CA
Posts: 48
|
a nessage fromn the trenches!!!
"crappy HDV" ? Last time I checked before HDV came out indies were shooting on MiniDV... so,unless all have suddenly won the Lotto and changed to the new Arriflex D-20, HDV is a hell lotta better than DV.
So how I see it HDV is a blessing for indies on a below zero budget. So yeah, the new Canon has HD SDI output, great!! I will plug it straight to my Quantel iQ v1.2 with 7TB of storage so I can handle it... gimme a break! In my world 99% of the work I do I can do it with a Z1, if I ever need more for that 1% Ill rent a Viper and post somewhere else. And people should really get over the 24p thing, if making a good movie absolutely depends on you being able to shoot 24p then you might start looking for another job. If you really need to degrade your work to make it look like a choppy 100 year old technology you can always do it in post and save thousands of dollars. Don't get me wrong, I do like film look in many cases and I have converted to 24p a lot of my stuff, but I rather capture as much information as I can and then tweak it to my liking in post, witch I can do with my cheap G5 dual 2.7MHZ and a couple hundred gigs in IEEE1934 drives. There is a path from 60i to 24p but there is no path the other way. 60i gives me options that 24p dosn't. So, here is my prediction for the REAL world : the new Canon is not even going to bruise Sony's dominance of cheap HD market. Nor will the new Panasonic. The only one that may do a bit of damage is the JVC, then again not having 1080 is a bummer. |
September 15th, 2005, 11:15 PM | #25 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I agree with you completely Adrian. The new Canon's biggest competition is the JVC HD100. The HVX200 is over in another arena entirely; the Sony Z1 is also in another place altogether. Each of these cameras have specific target markets and very different applications from each other.
|
September 15th, 2005, 11:16 PM | #26 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2005, 11:20 PM | #27 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
That's what's so cool about it... a DVCPRO HD deck will record that incoming HD-SDI video at 720p.
|
September 15th, 2005, 11:58 PM | #28 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
But doesn't a DVCPRO-HD deck has also component IN? So it would also record what comes out the Z1 as 720p. But that doesn't make the Z1 a 720p camera right?
See, what I'm not getting is all this hype over the SDi and people saying the camera can do 1080p, 720p etc. The camera can not. The decks will. But that's a different piece of equipment. You have to buy or rent it. There’s an added cost for that. And the other cameras can do it too. It sounds like a market gimmick to me. Really does. Sorry, but the H1 is a HDV camcorder. If people will consider it a 720p or 1080p HD camera because it can output video, which can be recorded by other decks as such, then so is the HD100 and Z1. Can you record 720p or 1080p to a computer from the H1? I would think not. So, it's a 1080i HDV camcorder, which outputs 1080i via SDI. |
September 16th, 2005, 12:15 AM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
I think you're right in your thinking, Michael. A better way to describe this would probably be to say it outputs the highest quality signal, so if it needs to be converted to other resolutions, it's possible. In other words, you can't take 720p out of the JVC and get real 1080i signal even with a deck. This is just an uncompressed stream...highest quality possible. You want to convert it? Fine... Remember my post about wanting more than HDV from this camera? This is exactly what I was talking about. It's a high quality option that will allow a MUCH higher quality signal than HDV, if needed. Options are always good and Canon did a great thing by putting the SDI out on this camera. In essence, this is what those Andromeda/Reel Stream guys were trying to do...grabbing an uncompressed signal (though SD for them) before it compresses for tape output. Only it's built in and it's a fully digital signal... Kevin |
|
September 16th, 2005, 12:31 AM | #30 | |||
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Michael Maier; September 16th, 2005 at 01:04 AM. |
|||
| ||||||
|
|