|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 13th, 2007, 02:52 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 36
|
Shallow D.O.F with the Canon XL2
G'day all!
I've read through the Canon specs in the sticky but can't seem to find a definite answer to this question... How shallow a depth of field are you able to get with the Canon XL2? I intend to get my hands on the XL2 in a few months, and as I am going for the film look with my project, D.O.F capabilities is of a high importance to me. Camera's like this aren't found in any old shop where I live (Perth, Western Australia) so really all I have to go on are internet/magazine articles and sample footage I've found on the net. Unfortunately none of the articles/reviews I've read seem to mention it, and virtually all the footage I've seen sports a very deep D.O.F So is this simply due to the people behind the cameras, or is it difficult to acheive a shallow D.O.F with the XL2? I know the 20x zoom should probably tell me something but at this point I don't know enough about lens' to tell - I'm still learning :) And while I'm here, can anyone tell me the fastest zoom in that can be pulled off with the auto zoom feature? I often use the "fast zoom" in my projects but usually have access only to handicams, and I have to go through a long and hard cheating process :P My apologies if these questions have been asked and answered before. Cheers - Jon
__________________
I had a handle on life but it broke. |
January 13th, 2007, 03:55 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Parma - Italy
Posts: 91
|
Jon, you can do a search using "shallow depth of field" in this section of the forum; and take a look at those threads:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ow+depth+field look the dog and the background (2nd pic) and http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=83722 those are mine footage. At the beginning of the first there are twoshots of a girl. She was moving so it was hard to keep the focus, but i think you got the idea. Later there is a guy close up on some streets. I see if i can shoot something today at various type of shot (medium shot, close up...); if i can, i'll post into my thread. |
January 13th, 2007, 04:02 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 36
|
Aah, you know for the life of me I didn't think to use the search function in these forums :P
Thanks very much Michele, they're just the examples I was looking for :) P.S some nice footage there. I really like the shot of the sky with that red tinge. Also impressed with how well the camera performed with such low light. Thanks again!
__________________
I had a handle on life but it broke. |
January 13th, 2007, 03:27 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 649
|
What will also help is getting the subject away from the background and shooting with the aperture as close to wide open as possible. Using a telephoto end of the zoom also helps sell the effect.
The problem with smaller formats is the inherent DOF is greater.
__________________
Mark Sasahara Director of Photography |
January 13th, 2007, 10:09 PM | #5 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
|
January 15th, 2007, 10:36 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
camera touching the subject (minimum focus distance) will throw the background out of focus pretty well, buut make framing extremely difficult...alternately, backing the camera up really far and zooming in will exaggerate the "Circles of Confusion" in the out of focus areas of the image, but flatten the image pretty heavily. More distance between your subject and your background will help exaggerate this effect garnering you more blur in the background.
|
January 16th, 2007, 01:59 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 56
|
Jon,
Here is a light hearted tutorial about DOF by Perry James who works for Digital Juice. As a matter of fact, there are several different videos on that site that cover a bunch of topics. Of course it mostly plugs their product but the content is great. Check it out http://www.digitaljuice.com/djtv/seg...how=all_videos
__________________
Currently using Panasonic AG AC160 Cameras. Editing with a custom built suite by http://www.videohardware.com running the latest Adobe Suite with Matrox. |
January 21st, 2007, 02:40 PM | #8 | |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oshawa, ON, CA
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Very noob question coming. Does the XL-2 have built in filters? I'm guessing no, but I figured I would ask. I don't have the XL-2 body or lens infront of me right now.
__________________
Canon XL-2 | Rebel XT iMac 20" 2.0Ghz 2GB RAM 256MB VRAM 500GB HDD |
|
January 21st, 2007, 02:49 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 649
|
The body itself doesn't have any built in filters, like a pro cam, but the lenses do have ND filters built in, 1/6th and 1/32. I forget how many stops each one is, there's a thread here somewhere that spells it out.
__________________
Mark Sasahara Director of Photography |
January 21st, 2007, 02:50 PM | #10 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oshawa, ON, CA
Posts: 19
|
Thanks, Mark. I appreciate it.
__________________
Canon XL-2 | Rebel XT iMac 20" 2.0Ghz 2GB RAM 256MB VRAM 500GB HDD |
January 22nd, 2007, 03:49 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 36
|
Thanks a lot to everyone who answered...you have been most helpful :)
__________________
I had a handle on life but it broke. |
January 22nd, 2007, 04:17 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 56
|
No Problem
Matt.....glad you found the link informative.
Mark is correct the 20X lense has three ND filters to choose from. Now since we are on the topic of D.O.F., I personally like the technique but find that I am sometimes limited using it because of my talent. Not "my talent" but the talent in front of the lense. Other than a few lines or paraphrasing a script, my talent has to wing his lines because it is impossible for him to read from the teleprompter so far away. I will note that I hate when a person doesn't make I contact with the lense and can be seen reading his/her lines from a cue card to the side of the camera. So with that in mind, I am interested in hearing how those who use D.O.F. get around this... Gary
__________________
Currently using Panasonic AG AC160 Cameras. Editing with a custom built suite by http://www.videohardware.com running the latest Adobe Suite with Matrox. |
January 22nd, 2007, 11:21 PM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chattanooga, tn
Posts: 721
|
Quote:
|
|
January 23rd, 2007, 04:13 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 56
|
Jarrod, I forgot. Thanks.
__________________
Currently using Panasonic AG AC160 Cameras. Editing with a custom built suite by http://www.videohardware.com running the latest Adobe Suite with Matrox. |
January 31st, 2007, 12:01 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 322
|
I have the 16x manual lens that I use with the Canon XL2. One thing that helps me in a pinch to get Shallow D.O.F. is using the macro focusing ring. I can quickly focus really tightly on a small object in the foreground and throw the background out even at close distances and while I'm wide open (f1.6)
Normally, I try to shoot with the lens shut down and at a distance which makes it easier to control what is in focus and what isn't, but play with the macro - just remember to return it to it's proper position or the focus will seem screwy.
__________________
Director: http://www.mediathreat.com |
| ||||||
|
|