|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 12th, 2006, 08:59 AM | #16 |
Jubal 28
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
|
Well, the problem there is that the hand-cranked movies varied in frame rate and were often much slower than 24 fps -- 8, 12, 16, 18 . . . all were common.
But you've got the right idea -- if you use a 1/24 shutter in 24p and then speed it up 200% on a 24p timeline, you get the eqivalent of 12 fps film projected at 24 fps and it may get you the look you're seeking.
__________________
www.wrightsvillebeachstudios.com |
May 12th, 2006, 09:07 AM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
But we seem to be straying a little from the original XL2 content Colin |
|
May 12th, 2006, 01:42 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 49
|
Colin after you try some of these settings suggested to you it would be great if you can post a frame grab and show us what you got.
|
May 12th, 2006, 01:50 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Colin |
|
May 12th, 2006, 05:52 PM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
Just do what I said =o)
David I respect your opinion but every professional DP I know uses 1/48 shutter to recreate the perfect film motion cadence. Cameras like the Varicam which I use quite often have a shutter off setting which is equivalent to 1/48 ash =o) |
| ||||||
|
|