|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 2nd, 2005, 07:06 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: manila, philippines
Posts: 102
|
what is coring
i've read all i can but cant get any real answer. any help appreciated.
|
May 2nd, 2005, 07:25 AM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I like the explanation that it's a poor man's noise reduction.
See http://www.videohelp.com/glossary?C#Coring |
May 2nd, 2005, 09:58 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
In coring the luminance is separated into its high and low frequency parts and the high frequency part processed so that any pixel with magnitude less than a threshold is set to 0. Any pixel with magnitude greater than the threshold is passed straight through. After this thresholding process the high and low frequency portions are recombined.
The result is noise reduction over areas of roughly constant luminance. If the threshold is set too high, however, the texture of objects is supressed, skin looks like plastic etc. |
May 2nd, 2005, 05:24 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: manila, philippines
Posts: 102
|
thanks chris and a.j.
but when coring does touch a pixel, what happens to chroma? is there an ideal setting? i'm finding ways to reduce noise on my xl-2. it has a lot of detail, but a lot of noise compared to my xl-1. thanks. |
May 2nd, 2005, 05:40 PM | #5 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
May 2nd, 2005, 08:25 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
AFAIK it is only done to the luma part of the signal because the high frequency components of the chroma components have already been removed i.e. they are much narrower bandwidth signals already.
|
May 3rd, 2005, 01:31 AM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: manila, philippines
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|