|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 15th, 2004, 11:48 AM | #1 |
Posts: n/a
|
a few questions that haven't been asked??
At least I couldn't find these by browsing the forum.
Does the Gain work in all of the modes? 60i, 30p and 24p? Does the auto Focus work in all modes? 60i, 30p and 24p? I read that the viewfinder doesn't show guides for 16x9 mode. Does that mean that the image will be stretched vertically in the viewfinder and on an external monitor? (non 16x9 monitor that is) Is the iris control now more of a switch and less of a wheel? It looks like it is notched and couldn't spin infinitely but would be pushed up or down and the logic of the XL2 would open or close the iris based on this. Anyone? |
July 15th, 2004, 01:08 PM | #2 |
Skyonic New York
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 614
|
Does the Gain work in all of the modes? 60i, 30p and 24p?
yes Does the auto Focus work in all modes? 60i, 30p and 24p? yes will be stretched vertically in the viewfinder and on an external monitor? no stretch black bands, same goes for monitor Is the iris control now more of a switch and less of a wheel? yes and it works very well... |
July 15th, 2004, 01:33 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Luis Obispo CA
Posts: 1,195
|
looks like the same switch canon implemented on the gl2...It took awhile to get use to, but it works fine.
Barry |
July 15th, 2004, 03:43 PM | #4 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
16:9 is letterboxed in the EVF and external 4:3 monitors.
CORRECTION: 16:9 is letterboxed in the EVF only. |
July 15th, 2004, 04:08 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Do you know if the viewfinder has underscan?
|
July 15th, 2004, 04:34 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gwaelod-y-garth, Cardiff, CYMRU/WALES
Posts: 1,215
|
No, it doesn't have underscan. In fact, the picture area in the viewfinder matched what I was seeing on my domestic tv.
It would be nice to be able to see a little more of things happening in the edges... Robin. |
July 15th, 2004, 04:41 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles Ca
Posts: 126
|
I'm curious if it has a peaking feature like the dvx, i have grown to love that feature.
|
July 15th, 2004, 05:06 PM | #8 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
The monochrome CRT finder has a peaking control. The color LCD finder does not.
|
July 15th, 2004, 05:15 PM | #9 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA (travel frequently)
Posts: 837
|
Well, for what it is worth, there is a seperate EVF settings control in the XL2 menu which does include a Sharpness control for the new EVF.
- don
__________________
DONALD BERUBE - noisybrain. Productions, LLC Director Of Photography/ Producer/ Consultant http://noisybrain.com/donbio.html CREATE and NETWORK with http://www.bosfcpug.org and also http://fcpugnetwork.org |
July 15th, 2004, 05:21 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gwaelod-y-garth, Cardiff, CYMRU/WALES
Posts: 1,215
|
Yes, but it doesn't really make the edges "zing" to be enough of an asset for focussing...
Robin. |
July 15th, 2004, 06:23 PM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
And now a silly, but very hopeful question. The EVF doesn't have underscan, but if you flip it up into the LCD does *that* do underscan? Just hoping.
|
July 15th, 2004, 06:28 PM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
There's no way that flipping up the eyepiece would magically give underscan. It is either there or it isn't. That is unfortunate and reduces the value of the camera a bit in my book. It's not a tota deal killer, but it's a negative.
|
July 15th, 2004, 06:37 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Bill, no I know that, but what I was getting at was, maybe the LCD was underscane, but the EVF edges covered some of this. As I said, I was being hopeful. I'm quite bummed that they've apparently used the GL2 irs control wheel. That thing is stupid - a rolling wheel would have been much better.
Aaron |
July 15th, 2004, 07:28 PM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
It doesn't have iris control on the lens?
Sheesh, my new camera euphoria is really starting to go away. Y'know, a camera is a helluvalot more than just its chips. A little thing like not having underscan in the viewfinder can be a very big thing on a complicated shoot. I've seen shots ruined because the cameraman did not have underscan and couldn't adjust minutely when the soundman dipped the boom just a hair too low....and when you're on a tight set and want to pan as far as you can but not get the damn lightstand or edge of the cyc in the shot, and you can see it coming in underscan. Someday somebody will come out with a "handycam" style small camera with all the professional features you need to make movies. Seems to me that it wouldn't really cost anymore to do some things right. Not everything, obviously, but...for example, how come I get iris control on the lens where it belongs with a DSR250 but not with a PD150? How come they don't give me a color temperature readout on the 250 like the DSR500 has? The camera white balances perfectly, so it KNOWS what the damn color temperature is. With all the other crap they put in the viewfinder, it's not a huge stretch of the imagination to believe they could give me a color temperature readout just as easily as the little hand that tells me steadyshot is on. Of course...if they put all the good stuff on the cheap cameras, lots of people would probably not want to spend the money on the better stuff. |
July 15th, 2004, 07:42 PM | #15 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
"Of course...if they put all the good stuff on the cheap cameras, lots of people would probably not want to spend the money on the better stuff."
You hit it right on the head! Aaron |
| ||||||
|
|