|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 14th, 2004, 02:39 AM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 366
|
XL2 CCD Performance?
Has Canon made any statements about improved CCD performance with the XL2?
With the greatly increased pixel numbers and their reduced size, relative to those of the XL1, as well as a smaller CCD sensing-area, I wonder what the low-light performance will be? When Sony introduced the VX2000 and the VX2100, they made a big issue about how much more sensitive their CCDs were and promoted their increased low-light capabilities. If Canon uses new CCDs that have similar increases in sensitivity, this might more than offset the effective size reduction. Steve McDonald |
July 14th, 2004, 05:18 AM | #32 | |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Steve: as quoted previously by me:
Quote:
this topic. So perhaps we need to continue to discuss the low light capabilities there? click here for thread Rich: I've also explained this a couple of times. But to get my most detailed explenation on true versus fake 16:9 and how this is stored, click here to go to that post
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
|
July 14th, 2004, 09:20 AM | #33 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles Ca
Posts: 126
|
ic, i hadnt seen an explanation on how the xl2 did 16x9 till now, sorry.
so from what it sounds like, the xl2 will do a squeeze, much like an anomorphic to get a 16x9 image? ok, thanks for the info. cant wait to see some images from the cam, all very exciting! |
| ||||||
|
|