February 22nd, 2007, 10:35 PM | #196 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 423
|
Now keep in mind, I haven't actually used either of these lenses, but based on what I've read at the XL2 Watchdog site, I'd lean towards the 16x Servo Lens. It gives you motorized zoom as an option, with a slightly wider/longer zoom range. There is an extensive review on the Chris Hurd's XL2 Watchdog site.
http://dvinfo.net/canon/articles/article82.php Also, FYI there's a great 16x for sale in the private classifieds right now... http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=86839 Now I'm not on commission for Ken, or anything, just thought I'd throw in my 2 cents... Kevin |
February 22nd, 2007, 11:46 PM | #197 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
The 16x is longer but not wider than the 14x. Also the 14x has a true manual stepless iris ring, like a pro video lens. I opted for this over the 16x back in the day and didn't regret it (or miss the extra length on the telephoto side of things, to be honest).
I am actually selling my 14x with a Century wide angle adaptor here also. http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=65633
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
February 23rd, 2007, 02:30 AM | #198 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mystic Ct.
Posts: 477
|
Kevin, Charles,
Thank you both for your replies, not better, but different that is what I get from them. Hmmm... gotta think on this. :-) Bill
__________________
Cinematographers Bring Shadow To Light Last edited by Bill Hamell; February 23rd, 2007 at 10:11 AM. |
February 23rd, 2007, 02:33 AM | #199 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
True iris can be helpful in many situations... image quality is similar in both and IMHO improved over the stock lens. 16X has more aberration on the long end but adds the servo motor.
ash =o) |
February 23rd, 2007, 03:12 AM | #200 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
I much prefer the handling of the 16X Manual Servo over the 14X lens. I also got on better with the 16X MF over the Optex converted Fujinon XL 14X MF lens.
Last edited by Tony Davies-Patrick; February 23rd, 2007 at 09:48 AM. |
February 23rd, 2007, 03:13 AM | #201 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
double post edited
|
February 23rd, 2007, 09:24 AM | #202 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mystic Ct.
Posts: 477
|
Ash, Tony,
Thanks, now if I could only fit a servo to the 14x. (large grin) Being that I prefer to shoot totally manual I'm thinking the 14x is the one I want. Anyone else care to comment? Bill
__________________
Cinematographers Bring Shadow To Light |
February 23rd, 2007, 09:50 AM | #203 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
The 16X can shoot totally manual...you simply disengage the Servo switch.
|
April 6th, 2007, 04:42 PM | #204 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Iris change on 20x question
Without using the Tv or Av mode, is there any way to get a smooth iris change (rather than having a "stepped" look) on the 20x? Like the iris ring on a more professional camera lens (or like the old 14x full manual lens. I don't think the 16x has one, does it?). Wouldn't that be easier? I never shoot on auto, For example, if I need to go from inside to outside quickly. I shoot a lot off the shoulder, and I just think it's a hassle moving my hand from the focus and zoom rings down to the iris/shutter buttons, while keeping my eye in the viewfinder, fumbling around for the buttons. Wouldn't it just be easier if there was a ring next to the others? Or am I just being picky? Guess I'm used to the news cameras I used to use. Yes, I know it might be comparing apples and oranges...
Jonathan |
April 6th, 2007, 05:58 PM | #205 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
Hi Jonathan. I'm afraid this is one of the "features" of the XL2. It's no consolation for you at the moment, but at least Canon did improve this when they designed the XH-A1. It has a smooth action iris ring that is so easy to use.
Richard |
April 6th, 2007, 07:16 PM | #206 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 75
|
My only suggestion would be to shoot the scenes that you need to do indoor/outdoor transitions on in Auto...?
|
April 9th, 2007, 08:49 AM | #207 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Richard...Thanks for the clarification.
Chris...I was thinking about that, but with the stuff I shoot, I have to keep rolling. You can't switch from manual mode to Av or Tv while the tape's still rolling and not get a black picture, can you? I'd hate to try it and mess up my transport if you can't. Jonathan |
April 9th, 2007, 10:00 AM | #208 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
There's a much easier way to switch between manual and auto modes than using the power dial. For manual mode, shoot in Tv (shutter priority mode) with the Exposure Lock button pressed. This is identical to shooting in Manual mode. Press the Exp. Lock button again to revert to auto exposure. Press it again to revert to manual exposure. Works like a charm, and is much better than Manual mode in that you can instantly switch to AE if you need it.
|
April 9th, 2007, 10:34 AM | #209 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Thanks, Chris, I'll try it out. Never thought of that!
Jonathan |
May 21st, 2007, 03:40 AM | #210 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth UK
Posts: 8
|
I too have discovered the autofocus noise, its like a constant clicking, very subtle but definatly not right. when fully zoomed in I can see the picture slightly moving with the clicks too, this is anoying, luckily my cam is still under warenty so I shal be asking advise from the shop. I will post a full report to let everyone know of my findings.
|
| ||||||
|
|