|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 28th, 2007, 02:17 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 475
|
|
September 28th, 2007, 02:21 PM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
That Vocas stuff is pretty slick, but it appears they sell in every industrialized nation in the world but the U.S. Makes me feel like a third world country. Any idea on prices?
|
September 28th, 2007, 04:09 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tartu, Estonia
Posts: 579
|
I`m really confused if one can use a mattebox at all with 109mm diametre original Canon WA converter on XH A1?
4x4 (100mm) filters will not cut it I assume? The Vocas 250 is the widest and most WA usable compact 1+1 stage mattebox out there but the rear opening is only 105mm by the specs so it will not be usable with the uber good original WA converter from Canon. Any thoughts? T |
September 28th, 2007, 10:59 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
You can see the part numbers here B&H has most of them |
|
September 29th, 2007, 12:29 AM | #20 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guildford UK
Posts: 18
|
Geardear Matte Box
Hi Bill
Not yet. As soon as I stared to use my wonderful A1 I realised I needed more computer grunt. I had to use all my funds to upgrade my ageing G5 imac. (New 2.8 imac on the way). Hopefully first quarter 08. Still going to be the GEARDEAR. Trev |
September 29th, 2007, 09:40 AM | #21 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I've been fine without one but there are situations where it might be nice. So far Geardear seems the overall best deal for the money.
One concern is my quick release plate. I use the Canon quick release plate (which cost about $135) because the camera has a typical still camera tripod thread, ie., 1/4" instead of the normal 3/8". And when I use a teleprompter, which requires the O'Connor 50 and it has only 3/8". The plate has both, so that's cool. But I'd have to put it on top of the rod holder platform, and then the tripod's plate on the bottom, if that makes sense. I don't know what that extra height would do to matte box alignment. I'd have the same problem with any matte box, obviously, that required rails, which is pretty much any mattebox that I'd want. |
September 30th, 2007, 06:16 PM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
Bill,
I used to use Geardear mattebox with rails on my M2+DVX combo. I ordered a 72-77 step-up ring to use it w/o rails on my new XH-A1. I'll tell you how it performs |
November 18th, 2007, 02:21 PM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Alvise, did you get the stepup ring yet? And if so, are you using the Geardear without rails, and do you use the French flag with it? How do you like it?
|
December 11th, 2007, 04:56 PM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 118
|
Hi everyone, long time reader first time poster...
I've been shopping matte boxes pretty extensively for my A1. I was set for the longest time on a geardear due to value and what all you can get. I was disappointed to find out they were molded from some sort of foam injection type process though so I began looking elsewhere.... I think I'm going with the redrockMicroMatte. They are finally being released in limited quantities but should be full force by Feb08 according to their forums. These look (and judging by redrock's rep) are made to be very top quality and offer everything that geardear does for even cheaper it appears. Full set up for $500. Then I think you have to add the rail support about $290. Still a shade cheaper then the deluxe A1 set up quote I received from geardear...($870ish I believe) Does anyone have a MicroMatte they are using with their A1? I'd love to get some feedback cause I'm pretty sure I'm set on that one, or at least until I hear some really positive feedback about the geardear... |
December 12th, 2007, 02:48 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 380
|
Chrosziel matte box fits Canon XH-A1/G1 with Canon 0.8x WA attachment with 1 mm to spare.
They have a XH-A1/G1 kit, with WA you just do not use the normal fill-in adapter, if you want to fill the 0.5mm gap this leaves (110 opening, 109mm lens) they sell you a rubber seal... |
December 12th, 2007, 11:41 AM | #26 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Are you referring to the WD-H72 Wide Angle Adapter? I was under the impression that this WA adapter was not compatible with ANY matte box kit... |
|
December 13th, 2007, 06:17 AM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 380
|
It is the one Canon sell with the camera (at a price).
|
December 13th, 2007, 10:13 AM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 118
|
Yeah that's the WD-H72. So then you can still use 4x4 filters in front of that WA adapter? And since it's made specific for the XHA1 it won't block the sensors in front?
That's very cool if it will allow the use of the WA and a filter. |
December 13th, 2007, 11:29 AM | #29 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 41
|
I am selling my soft mattbox I used before I sold my xha1. I have the step ring to put it on the xha1 if you are intrested in buying it. Let me know. Here is the site if you want to check it out first. http://www.cinetactics.com/StoreFront.bok
|
December 13th, 2007, 11:49 AM | #30 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Were you referring to this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Matte_Box.html It is for a 72mm lens so that would fit the XHA1 but it is not specific to the XHA1 in the description just the XL2/DVX100. I'm wondering if the baseplate piece is adjustable height wise so that it could fit the A1... |
|
| ||||||
|
|