|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 9th, 2007, 06:28 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 122
|
Everyone still happy with their A1?
I am about to take the A1 plunge and was wondering if all the A1 owners out there are still not regretting their purchase...
In other words, I am looking for for someone to say "yes you should definitely buy the A1" |
May 9th, 2007, 06:38 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa,Florida
Posts: 236
|
Buy it. you'll love it - not a breeze to learn to use though. be prepared to spend a lot of time reading and experimenting
|
May 9th, 2007, 07:18 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 747
|
I love it, but alot of people don't, my thinking is this, buy it if you have experience with video camera and know how to use them or willing to learn, don't buy it if you are the type that like the camera to do everything for you or have no idea what an iris is or don't care what it is. If you are of the later type, I suggest the Sony Z1, I use it before and it is a better auto camera than this one.
|
May 9th, 2007, 07:19 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
the A1 is just amazing. breathtaking, crisp and clean footage.
i'm overjoyed. you'll need to be a savvy operator to get the best out of it though. anything left on "auto" produces some really awful footage. |
May 9th, 2007, 07:59 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: caledonia MS
Posts: 26
|
Lots to learn
Jack,
I am a real novice with video but have some 35MM SLR experience. I have had my A1 for about 3 weeks and have done a couple short (5 min or less) pieces for my church. The ability to get what you want will take some time. I plan on doing events and weddings in the future (I have my first try on Friday). Depending on your experience, there are three major areas to learn. Getting the shots, editing your shots (I use Vegas 7.0e) and presenting/selling your finished product. The A1 will get you the shots, but you will have to learn to make it sing for you. For $3000+, this is not a point and shoot. It is however a great camera for producing product that you have a good chance of selling to someone with a SD or HD television or projector. |
May 9th, 2007, 08:05 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 222
|
Flawless camera, I wouldn't say it's hard to learn. But just like any pro camera, experience with manual settings is what's required for good shots.
Awesome camera though. |
May 9th, 2007, 08:44 PM | #7 |
Disjecta
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 937
|
I worried I wouldn't be able to capture the magic I was used to with my DVX but it easily surpassed that camera.
__________________
Try my Digital Therapy: http://www.pinelakefilms.com/digital_therapy.html Films on ExposureRoom: http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/videos/ |
May 9th, 2007, 08:51 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 157
|
I've never hesitated with Canon. I wouldn't call this camera hard to learn, especially if you are a previous Canon shooter.
|
May 9th, 2007, 11:53 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Peel,Isle of Man(UK)
Posts: 194
|
"yes you should definitely buy the A1".... There you go,I said it for you.
The first couple of days with my A1 were terrible - I was convinced I'd bought a dud. The picture was terrible and as far as I was concerned getting rid of my Sony PD-170 was a BIG mistake. But then I took a bit of time to read the manual,search this site for advice and play with the A1. Today I wouldn't consider buying anything else. As a lot of people have said though you need to be in control of everything - turn anything auto OFF and learn to use the zebra stripes. The best tip I got though is to keep the iris a wide as possible - I think any footage shot with an aperture smaller than 5.6 is un-usable. I love to hear people gasp when they see well shot HD footage,one friend said "my God! it's like looking through a window!...." |
May 10th, 2007, 04:52 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
[QUOTE=Phil Kay;676327]I think any footage shot with an aperture smaller than 5.6 is un-usable.[QUOTE]
I second that.
__________________
Michael |
May 10th, 2007, 06:25 AM | #11 |
Disjecta
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 937
|
Sorry, I completely disagree with this statement. Many of my favorite shots were taken way outside of this range and they are also beautiful.
__________________
Try my Digital Therapy: http://www.pinelakefilms.com/digital_therapy.html Films on ExposureRoom: http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/videos/ |
May 10th, 2007, 06:41 AM | #12 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,015
|
|
May 10th, 2007, 06:51 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 122
|
Wow, thanks everybody for all the responses. Seems like its still a hit and thats good to know. I'm convinced. Thanks again.
|
May 10th, 2007, 07:50 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Peel,Isle of Man(UK)
Posts: 194
|
|
May 10th, 2007, 07:55 AM | #15 |
Disjecta
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 937
|
Not quite as simple as that. There are many times when even a small aperture can be creative. I'm agreeing with you in terms of optimal quality but "un-useable", I think is quite inaccurate.
__________________
Try my Digital Therapy: http://www.pinelakefilms.com/digital_therapy.html Films on ExposureRoom: http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/videos/ |
| ||||||
|
|